Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WRs in this draft are DEEP


MHS831

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Hindsight 20/20 again. 

Let's all be real for once..

Everybody loved the Jarret pick when it was made.. Even more than Kalil..

Brown led the nation in sacks his Senior year out FSU and we just lost Pep.. Nobody had a problem with this pick when made. 

Clausen was seen as a steal, Hogan was hyped up as a return specialist and Kony was dam near a superbowl MVP and considered a steal when we got him. 

Edward's, fua, and McClain were bad picks..

Well of course but how else are you supposed to grade drafts? Now will I say all of those picks failing were 100% Hurneys fault? No of course not it's mostly sarcasm a lot of those guys were put into some bad situations, some just had really shitty work ethics/couldnt stay healthy, and there are others that you pointed out that were just bad picks and that is also true.

The thing with Marty is he has a bad habit of selling out for development projects that never seem to develop...hopefully with Rhule that changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I cannot find one site that does not have some players way too high or too low, based on my perception.  The WR list is a bit off, in my opinion, but was used for a demonstration more than a blueprint.  I chose it because it ranked WRs by giving them a score based on an analysis of performance--a rubric.  However, that does not make it better or more accurate than others.  I actually wanted to kick about 4 with second round grades out and add about 6.

Individual teams are going to vary greatly to random generic big boards also simply due to scheme fit. Random big boards are basically just trying to evaluate overall talent level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Raskle said:

fair enough bud. Didn't mean anything with my comment other than to let folks know it was a variance to the norm. Can definitely appreciate the rubric being used to at least back their opinion, even if I find it a bit odd on their rankings.

Did not take it that way--you had a valid point.  I agree with your premise--heck, every year, my mental "Big Board" is shot to pieces when the actual draft rolls around.  I think we are probably more accurate now than we will be in April, after we have over-analyzed every player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ealy really disappoints me. That guy showed in SB50 that he could've been a STUD if he just wanted it. His teammates pretty much said the same all along. Von Miller's performance overshadowed his because they got the W, but Ealy was every bit as dominant for us.

I 100% agree it was really sad how his career turned out in the NFL I was really rooting for him, ya know with his personal life and all. Hopefully he can carve out a decent career in that new XFL League hes playing in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr Mojo Risin said:

I 100% agree it was really sad how his career turned out in the NFL I was really rooting for him, ya know with his personal life and all. Hopefully he can carve out a decent career in that new XFL League hes playing in

I don't feel sorry for the guys who have the talent and just don't put it to use. I feel sorry for all of those guys who came to camp and bust their asses and just don't have the prerequisite talent to make it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't feel sorry for the guys who have the talent and just don't put it to use. I feel sorry for all of those guys who came to camp and bust their asses and just don't have the prerequisite talent to make it.

He was given every opportunity. He definitely wasted that opportunity and I guess that was the saddest part to see. Some guys just dont want it bad enough. They get a little money and start to get lazy. It's like the drive that got them to where they are all but disappears

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

He was given every opportunity. He definitely wasted that opportunity and I guess that was the saddest part to see. Some guys just dont want it bad enough. They get a little money and start to get lazy. It's like the drive that got them to where they are all but disappears

I mean, I can't be surprised. He didn't do a whole lot in college either and let a guy in Michael Sam with nowhere near his talent level completely overshadow him. He got drafted on raw talent. We found out the hard way why that raw talent never really shined on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Well of course but how else are you supposed to grade drafts? Now will I say all of those picks failing were 100% Hurneys fault? No of course not it's mostly sarcasm a lot of those guys were put into some bad situations, some just had really shitty work ethics/couldnt stay healthy, and there are others that you pointed out that were just bad picks and that is also true.

The thing with Marty is he has a bad habit of selling out for development projects that never seem to develop...hopefully with Rhule that changes.

I'm just saying let's be realistic with ourselves.. 

Or add context to our criticism...

I can't poo on the Jarret pick  and call it a mistake and Hurney is dumb.. If I liked the pick and thought it was a steal and could rationalize why the pick was made and vice-versa...

Example .. I hated the Luke pick when it was made.. No way in hell can I act like I knew it was the right or easy choice  7 pro bowl years later... Right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Thanks--pie for the detailed response.

I have said that it is too early to give up on Little.   It is.  However, if he does not pan out--or gets another concussion--we could be in trouble.  I have almost convinced myself that if Thomas is there, you take him and move Little to G--it could be good for his health.  Having said that, there are dozens of scenarios--and Thomas (any T) is developmental as a rookie.  So if Brown and Thomas are there, I take Thomas--LTs are so hard to find, and although DB is a stud, we can find DTs easier than LTs.  But Brown can move around the front and play every position--that is rare too---and we have nothing at DT--at least we have Little at LT......Ultimately, I look at it this way---If I am wrong about Little and he cannot play LT, then he could get my QB hurt.  So by a hair, I take the T.  But that is just me on Feb 1...

The reason I am promoting WR is because it just looks as though there will be steals in the third round---based on needs, there is no way we meet our most pressing needs (OL, DL) by taking a WR or CB in the first 2 rounds.  When I see 12 WRs who should be first or second rounders in any other draft, I have to think one or two drop and the value is too good to pass up.

For LT I have to wait for the combine because I want one that can stop speed rushers so hes got to be really athletic. That is the reason I lean toward Brown at the moment because he is easier to judge by the eye. As far as WR I agree because after the 2nd round I like pure BPA because I want guys that are useful right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CatTower said:

If there are a lot of high grade WRs, we need to worry about upgrading our secondary.  

I don't think our secondary would be half bad if we could actually stop teams from running it down our throats.. We need to improve our front 7 and resign our secondary... but that's  just my opinion..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don't think our secondary would be half bad if we could actually stop teams from running it down our throats.. We need to improve our front 7 and resign our secondary... but that's  just my opinion..

Gonna have to get this Bradberry situation figured out.

I'm curious to see Jackson under the new staff. It really seemed like he just checked out this season. Honestly, it felt that way about most of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Gonna have to get this Bradberry situation figured out.

I'm curious to see Jackson under the new staff. It really seemed like he just checked out this season. Honestly, it felt that way about most of the team.

I  think  Jackson playing on the outside is out of position.. I think he is better in the slot.. I think the bigger physical WR give him a problem 1on 1 and he can handle things better in tighter confinement like the slot position  ..jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

I  think  Jackson playing on the outside is out of position.. I think he is better in the slot.. I think the bigger physical WR give him a problem 1on 1 and he can handle things better in tighter confinement like the slot position  ..jmo

Possibly. His tackling concerns me at nickel though. I just think we need to be smarter about our matchups on the outside. Allow Jackson to travel with the speedier receiver and allow Bradberry to travel with the more physical receiver. We started doing that some last year. I think we need to make it a staple though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...