Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 Wide Sets


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

I think we're going to be seeing a lot of it. Nickel and Dime the hell right out of the opposing D all the way down the field.

Imagine Cam in a 5 Wide Set with Moore, Samuel, Jeudy, Thomas, McCaffrey .. oh my

This is Cam's team. Recognize. Cam Newton is the most important person in the building. Believe that.

Cam Newton is special, have we forgotten? Cam's worst season in this offense is going to be as good as his MVP 2015 stats. I regularly expect 40 TD passing seasons from Cam now.

We want to win with offense, not defense. Finally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Seriously...Mods...clean this poo up.

You didn’t have to open it. While I agree it’s an incredibly stupid opinion, at least the OP is trying to contribute. The 5 wide set is not something I would want to see a whole lot of. It’s college garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rayzor said:

No one forces you to click on any thread, no matter how horrible it is or how annoying the thread creator is.

I mean, the quality of content on this board is in your hands. Soap is not a bad option from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

You didn’t have to open it. While I agree it’s an incredibly stupid opinion, at least the OP is trying to contribute. The 5 wide set is not something I would want to see a whole lot of. It’s college garbage.

The 5 wide set was a mirage of a title to loop us all into another worship fest for the lord and savior Sir Cameron J Newton. That’s my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, WarHeel said:

I mean, the quality of content on this board is in your hands. Soap is not a bad option from time to time.

How about show us what a quality thread looks like by starting one yourself instead of bitching about what someone else does.

Quality also depends on members creating good discussion. How about trying to start one yourself if you think it's a problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I mean, the quality of content on this board is in your hands. Soap is not a bad option from time to time.

"Quality" is completely objective. If you disagree with the opinion, state your own. Hell, plenty of takes that were popular and seemed reasonable at the time proved to be pretty damn idiotic in the long-run.

I never agreed with it, but early in the season when Little and Daley looked promising, it was a fairly prevalent opinion on the board that we should shop Moton. Think about how utterly fuged our OL would be right now if we'd traded Moton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, let's make it a staple of offense to leave Cam hung out to dry behind a bad OL in five wide sets.

Yeah but in a 5 wide with 5 legit weapons like we would be fielding .. Cam wouldnt have to stand back there for 10 years and wait for somebody to pop open. Surely one of the 5 would be schemed to get open in two seconds and other routes are deep, intermediate .. lots of options for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...