Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule and Dave Gettleman: "You win Superbowls by running the bull and stopping the run"


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This thread wouldn't exist if Kyle Shanahan hadn't inexplicably abandoned the run in the 4th quarter.

I feel likes it’s more on KC’s D then Kyle honestly. They probably saved looks all season for stopping the run and forcing pass this game and Kyle was simply not prepared for them. By no means is that a statement absolving Kyle though he played his part in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point of the adage to stop the run is to make a team one dimensional and with a good pass rush pressure the QB. Additionally being able to run the ball means you aren't one dimensional yourself . KC did that in the second half against San Francisco. Additionally Mahomes did use the scramble to avoid pressure and at the end they sealed the victory with a run. So the adage held true. Sure KC passed a bunch and most teams do pass more than they run for the most part.  That really doesn't make the adage less true 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you need to able to run the ball and stop it but having a superstar at QB can cover up a whole lot of flaws. Kansas city has a been down in every playoff game this year and they just won the super bowl because they have a QB that can make plays. Hopefully Cam can come back and do that for us. high five carolina panthers GIF by NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People lie about numbers all the time. Cherry pick stats that back up their narrative and discount or ignore numbers that don’t.

KC didn’t win the Super Bowl until last 6 minutes and really not until the last 49ers drive.

KC did limit the run and ran the ball pretty well.

the 4th quarter they completely shut down the 49ers,.. still, if not for Shannahan and some seriously blown coverage on the 3-15 which was the game really, this would all be snot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line.................rules have been changed over the year by the NFL specifically to make it a more pass friendly game..........rules to protect QBs in the pocket and rules that allow receivers to breakaway from defenders have given exactly what you see with the KC offense.............a potent passing QB with quick wide receivers that get open...........

If a capable Oline can deal enough with even the best D-line.....like you saw with KC over 49ers recently........ then you can not only win but win from behind........

People who think Defense wins champions and running backs are all it takes to move the chains are going against the grain of what the NFL has changed over recent years in the rule book to alter the way the game is played today. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...