Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL article on why WRs are making a big impact sooner


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I love me some wide receivers, so much so that I was called a wide receiver extremist by a longtime Huddler (and happily accepted the label, though at the time it was meant as a criticism).

Well any casual fan can tell that this is a so-called "passing league" now, not to minimize the value of running the ball, and I'm a firm believer that you use the RB to set up the pass and the pass to set up the run. Notice I said the "RB" and not the "run" as is the normal term. I think that of course you can still use the run to set up the pass if you have dynamic, versatile pass-catching backs and dynamic, adaptive OCs that know how to use them. But dynamic wide receivers or, perhaps more importantly (perhaps) a dynamic, versatile receiving corps, can win games all by themselves with a smart QB at the helm. But to get to the reason for this thread, it seems like WRs are more skilled and ready from day one, and that's why the skilled ones should always get a double take if they happen to fall into your lap, regardless of round IMO. An article on the NFL's website discusses the trend towards more skilled, bigger, stronger and faster, more learned and experienced and/or pro-ready receivers coming out of college these days, and says don't be surprised if the trend continues.

"Perhaps the trends impacting the receiver position are simply allowing those talented individuals to have more opportunities to shine. Either way, there's ample reason to believe the class of 2020 has been set up to make good on the hype -- and that the once-rare successful young receiver is here to stay."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001108999/article/2020-nfl-draft-learning-curve-for-young-wrs-thing-of-the-past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

I think there may be some truth to what you're saying. The gap between the NFL and College passing games has certainly lessened markedly, but receivers may be green in the sense that they haven't run the whole route tree, but the routes they are running, they have more experience at it than receivers did of yesteryear because run-routes and pass-routes now have a greater degree of overlap due to RPO concepts, so even run routes turn into pass routes (if you get what I'm saying).

Get the ball in their hands and let them do what they do on any given play (as you suggested)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, Patrick Mahomes is the best player in the league and he even admits that he won the MVP while not really understanding how to read a defense. Spead 'em out and let 'er rip. When you put enough athletes on the field, it's damn near impossible to account for all of them.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2020/03/06/patrick-mahomes-reading-defenses-hbo-the-shop-trailer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or does anyone else not think it was ironic that Ron Rivera was quoted in the article? Here's a guy that seemed to be loath to let rookies play over vets who weren't getting the job done! Now of course he did get rookie WRs more involved, so I might be being a bit unfair, but I think it's because circumstances demanded it more than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2020 at 4:43 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, Patrick Mahomes is the best player in the league and he even admits that he won the MVP while not really understanding how to read a defense. Spead 'em out and let 'er rip. When you put enough athletes on the field, it's damn near impossible to account for all of them.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2020/03/06/patrick-mahomes-reading-defenses-hbo-the-shop-trailer

Reminds me of Daunte Culpepper.  He never had to learn how to read defenses until Randy Moss left.  Then his entire career came crashing down in a hurry.  It was clear he didn't know what he was looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wes21 said:

Reminds me of Daunte Culpepper.  He never had to learn how to read defenses until Randy Moss left.  Then his entire career came crashing down in a hurry.  It was clear he didn't know what he was looking at.

What the hell are you talking about? There were many factors as to why his career went downhill, including the replacement of Moss with a lemon, but injuries played a huge role! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2020 at 4:29 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

One of the main premises of the article is that WR are more prepared not greener than ever 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

One of the main premises of the article is that WR are more prepared not greener than ever 

I didn't even read the article. I just stated my opinion on why WRs are making a bigger impact sooner in recent years. Now that I've read the article, I think you might wanna re-read it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...