Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL article on why WRs are making a big impact sooner


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I love me some wide receivers, so much so that I was called a wide receiver extremist by a longtime Huddler (and happily accepted the label, though at the time it was meant as a criticism).

Well any casual fan can tell that this is a so-called "passing league" now, not to minimize the value of running the ball, and I'm a firm believer that you use the RB to set up the pass and the pass to set up the run. Notice I said the "RB" and not the "run" as is the normal term. I think that of course you can still use the run to set up the pass if you have dynamic, versatile pass-catching backs and dynamic, adaptive OCs that know how to use them. But dynamic wide receivers or, perhaps more importantly (perhaps) a dynamic, versatile receiving corps, can win games all by themselves with a smart QB at the helm. But to get to the reason for this thread, it seems like WRs are more skilled and ready from day one, and that's why the skilled ones should always get a double take if they happen to fall into your lap, regardless of round IMO. An article on the NFL's website discusses the trend towards more skilled, bigger, stronger and faster, more learned and experienced and/or pro-ready receivers coming out of college these days, and says don't be surprised if the trend continues.

"Perhaps the trends impacting the receiver position are simply allowing those talented individuals to have more opportunities to shine. Either way, there's ample reason to believe the class of 2020 has been set up to make good on the hype -- and that the once-rare successful young receiver is here to stay."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001108999/article/2020-nfl-draft-learning-curve-for-young-wrs-thing-of-the-past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

I think there may be some truth to what you're saying. The gap between the NFL and College passing games has certainly lessened markedly, but receivers may be green in the sense that they haven't run the whole route tree, but the routes they are running, they have more experience at it than receivers did of yesteryear because run-routes and pass-routes now have a greater degree of overlap due to RPO concepts, so even run routes turn into pass routes (if you get what I'm saying).

Get the ball in their hands and let them do what they do on any given play (as you suggested)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, Patrick Mahomes is the best player in the league and he even admits that he won the MVP while not really understanding how to read a defense. Spead 'em out and let 'er rip. When you put enough athletes on the field, it's damn near impossible to account for all of them.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2020/03/06/patrick-mahomes-reading-defenses-hbo-the-shop-trailer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or does anyone else not think it was ironic that Ron Rivera was quoted in the article? Here's a guy that seemed to be loath to let rookies play over vets who weren't getting the job done! Now of course he did get rookie WRs more involved, so I might be being a bit unfair, but I think it's because circumstances demanded it more than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2020 at 4:43 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, Patrick Mahomes is the best player in the league and he even admits that he won the MVP while not really understanding how to read a defense. Spead 'em out and let 'er rip. When you put enough athletes on the field, it's damn near impossible to account for all of them.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2020/03/06/patrick-mahomes-reading-defenses-hbo-the-shop-trailer

Reminds me of Daunte Culpepper.  He never had to learn how to read defenses until Randy Moss left.  Then his entire career came crashing down in a hurry.  It was clear he didn't know what he was looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wes21 said:

Reminds me of Daunte Culpepper.  He never had to learn how to read defenses until Randy Moss left.  Then his entire career came crashing down in a hurry.  It was clear he didn't know what he was looking at.

What the hell are you talking about? There were many factors as to why his career went downhill, including the replacement of Moss with a lemon, but injuries played a huge role! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2020 at 4:29 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

I think it's because the NFL is finally catching up to what college teams have understood for a long time. Forget trying to develop everyone into a well rounded do it all player and embrace what a guy does do well instead of focusing on what he doesn't do well. These guys are honestly coming out of college as green as ever. A lot of these guys only run two or three routes. But spread the D out, put a bunch of talent on the field, and let 'er rip. College teams have been doing this for years and now we're finally getting to the point where most NFL teams' offenses more closely resemble a college offense than the "pro style offense" of old.

One of the main premises of the article is that WR are more prepared not greener than ever 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

One of the main premises of the article is that WR are more prepared not greener than ever 

I didn't even read the article. I just stated my opinion on why WRs are making a bigger impact sooner in recent years. Now that I've read the article, I think you might wanna re-read it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
    • His wife makes great meatballs though. To be fair, he didn't hire himself here. He dazzled and bamboozled them with what they wanted to hear. He was going to be an innovative, program-builder, culture-installing football genius. They ate it up like those fabulous meatballs.
×
×
  • Create New...