Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Disney are greedy assholes


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

So with COVID going on, they moved a ton of sports from ESPN to ESPN+ to get extra fees from customers who already pay for regular TV.  Now, they announced that they are creating an extra tier to Disney+ for additional fee with Premier Access... so now all new releases will go to Disney+ Premier Access and you cannot get Premier Access without buying Disney+.  Ain’t that some poo they wheeling and dealing...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least for the time being the Premier access seems to just be for the Mulan movie. I'd view it more like a substitute for a movie ticket right now. We'll see if they start adding already released content behind a premium access fee as well but right now it's just Mulan.

https://decider.com/2020/09/03/premier-access-disney-plus-mulan-how-to-watch/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarolinaSock said:

At least for the time being the Premier access seems to just be for the Mulan movie. I'd view it more like a substitute for a movie ticket right now. We'll see if they start adding already released content behind a premium access fee as well but right now it's just Mulan.

https://decider.com/2020/09/03/premier-access-disney-plus-mulan-how-to-watch/

They announced like 2 weeks ago Mulan will be on Disney+ for everyone to see and on Sept 4 they threw a curveball to clearly get extra cash from their customers.  Like bro, we get it, it’s covid and you did not get revenue you wanted but that’s a dick move.  Once covid started, Frozen II and Onward got moved to Disney+ the second theater shut down.  Mulan was released to TV on demand for 29.99 but barely anyone ordered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2020 at 9:39 PM, Ja Rhule said:

They announced like 2 weeks ago Mulan will be on Disney+ for everyone to see and on Sept 4 they threw a curveball to clearly get extra cash from their customers.  Like bro, we get it, it’s covid and you did not get revenue you wanted but that’s a dick move.  Once covid started, Frozen II and Onward got moved to Disney+ the second theater shut down.  Mulan was released to TV on demand for 29.99 but barely anyone ordered.

If you don't want to pay the $30, it's coming to regular Disney+ on December 4 at no extra charge. The premier access is exactly what it sounds like: "Premier." You can see if first if you don't want to wait.

Contrary opinion: I applaud the effort.

We're in uncharted waters, and this is a trial balloon, not only for Disney, but the movie companies in general: How much money can they make releasing one of their marquee films completely online.

Studios have been on the fence about releasing new movies online, even the same day as the theater for fear of losing out on the money. And they could dip their toes in the water with a B-level or C-level movie that they were expecting to make like, 40 to 100 million, and see how it goes. But we were never going to see a shift to virtual releases until they see that a new, blockbuster movie can rake in blockbuster type dollars, entirely online.

I hope they do make enough money to make it worthwhile. And I hope we see a lot more of these movies that were supposed to be spring/summer releases rolling out digitally. And if that model works, hopefully when the theaters re-open, you'll start to see more "digital the same day as theaters" new releases. Some people will still want the big screen experience, but if I don't want the hassle, of getting to the theater, the expensive ass concessions, virus super-spreaders, noisy candy crunchers, screen-shouters, rowdy teens, MST3K wannabees, and light-of-a-thousand-suns texting during the movie denizens, I can just watch it at home. Also, there's new release movies I probably wouldn't bother going go see in theaters, but would gladly pay $20 to watch at home.

That said, the price point of $30 is hiiiiiigh. I'm sure that's because this is a Disney movie, and they're counting on a family of 4+ watching, and have to make all that money on households rather than tickets. Plus they have to factor in watch parties, where you invite 10 friends over to watch a movie on your home theater setup. Then $30 is chump change. But for the wifey and me, or just me, it's steep. They'll have to find a way to make it more worthwhile for individual viewers.

Anyway, I'm actually excited to see how this pans out. Outside of IMAX experiences, I'm kinda over theaters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Shocker said:

My hatred of Disney is very healthy atp.  

My advice...ride it out without ESPN+ right now...the big matches will be on the big networks soon.  Them bundling these services is a money grab from one of greediest companies ever.

This.  They own ESPN and they moved a ton of sht to ESPN+ so people have no choice but to pay for poo that we already paying for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Shocker said:

So here is another one...Peacock is 5$ and probably mandatory for me as many EPL matches will be on this service from NBC.  Not on Roku or Fire yet but I can cast from ipad or use your smart tv.  A little annoying but cheap.

Peacock owned by NBC.  I bet you they moved to Peacock so now people have to get both Peacock and NBC Sport apps to watch games.  Ripoff.

You like football? $60 addition a year.  Soccer? Addition $60.  UFC? Additional $60 a year. And so on on top of regular cable TV with sport package on it...

Oh yea... when it comes to soccer... you want English soccer? $60.  You want French? $60.  You want to watch English FA cup? $60.  Champions League? $60.  And so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

We paid for the Disney+ subscription for the Mandalorian and all of the Marvel shows they were touting. Loved the Mandalorian and then we waited, paid, waited, paid, waited, paid... Got ready to cancel the subscription and oh, here comes the next season of the Mandalorian. And more teases of Marvel shows.

Kinda feeling strung along here. Anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/9/2020 at 9:19 AM, Khyber53 said:

We paid for the Disney+ subscription for the Mandalorian and all of the Marvel shows they were touting. Loved the Mandalorian and then we waited, paid, waited, paid, waited, paid... Got ready to cancel the subscription and oh, here comes the next season of the Mandalorian. And more teases of Marvel shows.

Kinda feeling strung along here. Anyone else?

Same.  Their shows have become stale.  Now it’s like “hey, don’t cancel... more to come”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2020 at 9:19 AM, Khyber53 said:

We paid for the Disney+ subscription for the Mandalorian and all of the Marvel shows they were touting. Loved the Mandalorian and then we waited, paid, waited, paid, waited, paid... Got ready to cancel the subscription and oh, here comes the next season of the Mandalorian. And more teases of Marvel shows.

Kinda feeling strung along here. Anyone else?

Yeah, I signed up for the Mandalorian and marvel shows.  Still waiting, but on the flip side, being able to watch the classics with my kids without shuffling DVDs is nice.  I have the Hulu/Disney+ bundle plus ad free hulu + live TV.

Funny thing is, despite my plethora of streaming services (CBS All Access, Hulu Full Monty, Netflix, and HBO Max), I'm still paying less for all that than I would have on cable.  I have zero intention of picking up NBC.  We are good here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2020 at 7:08 PM, Ja Rhule said:

So with COVID going on, they moved a ton of sports from ESPN to ESPN+ to get extra fees from customers who already pay for regular TV.  Now, they announced that they are creating an extra tier to Disney+ for additional fee with Premier Access... so now all new releases will go to Disney+ Premier Access and you cannot get Premier Access without buying Disney+.  Ain’t that some poo they wheeling and dealing...?

And they're talking about eliminating their stock dividend.  F those guys.  Glad I never bought stock in them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...