Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Gameday Thread...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Really? Then why does our offense look exactly like it did when Henning was the OC, and the Miami offense looks nothing like it?

please stop.....dan henning fuging sucks.....he calls the most retarded bullshit calls for our offense i have ever seen....screens to slow tight ends on 3rd and long, not running enough with ronnie brown.....chad henne has 3 great passes in a row....what does henning do? take out henne and put pat white in the game to get tackles for a loss. you guys were right to hate on henning. i despise the asshole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Then why does our offense look exactly like it did when Henning was the OC, and the Miami offense looks nothing like it?

because the scheme makes it look different. Miami has a different scheme, therefore it looks different.

I don't htink you understand what my point is. We all know its a run 1st offense. You are built to run, not pass every down, therefore you see more runs than passes.

Which is what I just said, but I'm repeating it in a different fashion in hopes that you follow me...

What many people are getting at here are the plays that are called mess up momentum and allow the defense to predict which play is going to be called. I am not talking in simple terms of "is it a run?" or "is it a pass?"... it's, are they going to run to the middle or outside, do they have a lead blocker or misdirection? These SMALL details are what I"m talking about and these simple details keep a defense on their toes...

This is all of Davidson's work.. this is what he does. Fox may have input on what he wants to do on 3rd and 21 or on 4th down, but he is not calling each play. Do you follow this? Not being a smart ass, seriously asking.. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please stop.....dan henning fuging sucks.....he calls the most retarded bullpoo calls for our offense i have ever seen....screens to slow tight ends on 3rd and long, not running enough with ronnie brown.....chad henne has 3 great passes in a row....what does henning do? take out henne and put pat white in the game to get tackles for a loss. you guys were right to hate on henning. i despise the asshole.

The question isn't whether or not Henning is good, it's who is in control of the Panther's offense. The Panther's offense looks exactly the same now as it did under Henning. The common denominator is Fox. Henning's new team, good or not, is very different in the way they call plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please stop.....dan henning f**king sucks.....he calls the most retarded bullshit calls for our offense i have ever seen....screens to slow tight ends on 3rd and long, not running enough with ronnie brown.....chad henne has 3 great passes in a row....what does henning do? take out henne and put pat white in the game to get tackles for a loss. you guys were right to hate on henning. i despise the asshole.

exactly... I think some people just don't listen to the points being made, which is understandable.. it's a message board with words, not expressions and lengthy explanations...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...