How's this for a stat.

[Moo Daeng]

Well Brown and Haynes were the only two with any TFL this season. 

[nctarheelreincarnated]

9 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Yes, and Boston was not.  Not that I am a fan of either, but Boston has been here much longer and seems to be more of a leader.

 

Both shouldn't be leaders at all. I'm an Oklahoma fan, and OU has the same issue with Patrick Fields in their secondary. Guy is awful, and was voted a Captain. The DC continues to play him, because he's the "QB" of the defense. Beyond moronic. 

[MasterAwesome]

9 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

Well Brown and Haynes were the only two with any TFL this season. 

Where are you getting that?

[Moo Daeng]

11 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Where are you getting that?

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/defense-tackles-for-loss

 

Teamrankings.com . And Burns too. 

Where did your screens shot come from?

[hepcat]

19 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Where are you getting that?

Good lord those sack numbers are ATROCIOUS 

[MasterAwesome]

12 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Team rankings.com. Your source seems to mix sacks in which isn't usual. Where did you get that?

Mine is ESPN.com.  Yeah it's a little unclear how ESPN considers a TFL...not sure why they have it under the "Sacks" section, but for example Yetur Gross-Matos is recorded as having 1 sack but 0 TFL so it doesn't appear that they're mixing/overlapping the two.

I can't attest to whether ESPN is 100% accurate (probably not) but your source is definitely flawed if they say Brown and Haynes are the only two with TFLs this year, there's no way that's true.  Here is one play that comes to mind of a Burns TFL.