Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones


saX man

The QB Poll: Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Let's say we have the choice of any of these guys...who's your pick? Give your reasons/team fit/scheme fit/dry your beans

    • Justin Fields, Ohio State, 6'3 228
      71
    • Zach Wilson, BYU, 6'3 210
      62
    • Trey Lance, NDSU, 6'4 226
      46
    • Kyle Trask, Florida, 6'5 240
      10
    • Mac Jones, Bama, 6'3 214
      8


Recommended Posts

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

I've been in a tussle over Fields, Wilson, & Lance.  It's just really close and I like all in their own ways.  I've had a feeling about us and Wilson just matching and aligning with what we want come draft time.  So gut feeling he's the one but want Fields the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

You don't over think this one, Fields is a no brainer #2 behind Trevor. Lance/Wilson a toss up then Trask/Jones late 1st and not in the discussion for us

I just don't know though.  I've heard in my limited scouting circle window about Jones being quite lauded.  Could be one of the most interesting QB groups in forever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Are we sure jets drafting a QB? Smart money would be to trade out.

Everyone on this forum thinks they're gonna get Lawrence.

 

Just now, Varking said:

Bro you wrote this right after you showed support for Sam Darnold... that’s some backwards thinking right there. 

At least I've seen Darnold make good throws at an elite competition level. He just has nothing to work with in the Jets. I have not seen that of Fields (who's bailed out by the elite talent around him all the time). I don't love Darnold or think he's a all-pro, but in terms of unlocked potential he's just as good as any of these guys and wouldn't require a first round pic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, qazsazsaz said:

Please put in an option for Sam Darnold. Honestly would rather have him.

image.thumb.png.daa78fba3c9683a338aa98102f3120c1.png

This is your guy?  Yea.  No thanks.  I'm not saying it's all his fault in NY, this is the Jets after all.  Maybe he'll turn into a real QB somewhere else, but I don't want to bet our franchise on a guy who hasn't looked very good against actual NFL competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And I’m fine with that.   But, with an impatient owner….that carries high odds of just him employing a new HC in the not distant future.  The “we will see if the scheme that doesn’t fit our #1 overall pick QB works or not” approach seems like a rocky plan for all.  If I was Canales I would give it shot but demanded I need to be able to sign a legit backup QB in case what I was given just doesn’t work and can transition at the end of the year 
    • That's really unlikely to happen.  The reality is, they are building for what Canales wants to do.  That's what all coaches do.  And if Bryce can't do that, he's another peg that has to be replaced.
    • There is nothing unpopular at all about your opinion. How everything played out on the field backs it up. Bryce starts the season with much fanfare, gives the atl game away, and showed anyone who watched that his arm talent was shockingly bad. bad look, so after a few weeks, the team cooks up a fake injury that nobody saw, presumably to decide what direction to go next. Enter Dalton for one game while Bryce is seen walking comfortably on the sideline, smiling and yucking it up like he’s a 5 year vet.  Dalton performs admirably given the circumstances (please no Dalton ve Bryce retort). The contrast between the two was so strong that it’s still debated today. If Dalton’s performance was similar to what Bryce had done up to that point, I truly believe they would have sat Bryce longer, but it wasn’t.  Dalton relied on vet savvy and a better arm. It’s debatable how many games that gets us. Meaningless to fans, but not to players with serious financial incentives on the line.  What it really was, was a ‘young man (see what I did?)’ playing a grown man’s game, who lacked basic fundamentals and essential physical talent, behind a line that was VERY ill suited for the scheme forced on them, WRs who looked completely confused and unmotivated, with a back stabbing coaching staff in give up mode, GM who I wouldn’t trust to organize my cooking utensil drawer and an owner who meets with coaches every week and tells them which plays he likes and which ones he doesn’t.  Bryce doesn’t get a mulligan, but I’m willing to give him a ‘my bad’ from the team. Last season stunk worse than Bigfoot’s di**. It literally can’t get ANY worse than the unwatchable sh** show that was last year.  I have to see a monumental change in his physical ability and overall confidence. I have to see that he found a laser arm, somewhere, in the offseason, or everything else is irrelevant. 
×
×
  • Create New...