Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to Root for (Week 17)


Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.

Recommended Posts

So you're telling me if Houston wins, the Dolphins pick (from HOU) actually rises in the draft?  I think you're smoking crack.  We can leap them if they win but I was speaking to my mentioned draft order of: 1-JAX, 2-NYJ, 3-MIA, 4-ATL

MIA (from 4-12 HOU) sits at the third pick at .540 SOS ahead of the 4-12 Falcons at .551

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saX man said:

So you're telling me if Houston wins, the Dolphins pick (from HOU) actually rises in the draft?  I think you're smoking crack.  We can leap them if they win but I was speaking to my mentioned draft order of: 1-JAX, 2-NYJ, 3-MIA, 4-ATL

MIA (from 4-12 HOU) sits at the third pick at .540 SOS ahead of the 4-12 Falcons at .551

 

No it means we pass Houston (Miami) . What am I missing here? Feels like the twilight zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmittysLawnGuy said:

No it means we pass Houston (Miami) . What am I missing here? Feels like the twilight zone.

Look at my first post you responded to.  I was explaining what would result with us leaping Philly to #7, not MIA (from HOU).  My scenario gets MIA ahead of ATL which helps if we want to trade up for Wilson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, saX man said:

So you're telling me if Houston wins, the Dolphins pick (from HOU) actually rises in the draft?  I think you're smoking crack.  We can leap them if they win but I was speaking to my mentioned draft order of: 1-JAX, 2-NYJ, 3-MIA, 4-ATL

MIA (from 4-12 HOU) sits at the third pick at .540 SOS ahead of the 4-12 Falcons at .551

 

I think he wants Houston above Atlanta so we can trade to jump ATL if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

Look at my first post you responded to.  I was explaining what would result with us leaping Philly to #7, not MIA (from HOU).  My scenario gets MIA ahead of ATL which helps if we want to trade up for Wilson. 

Don't we pass Houston (Miami) with them winning and us losing? Maybe we were just on two different pages. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where I'm taking this is do we want #6 but ATL at #3 or us at #7 and ATL #4?

I don't see MIA going QB so I don't care if they're ahead, they become a trade partner IMO and I'd like to steal ATL's future if they're eyeing Wilson.  That kid could be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...