Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2: Post Launch Discussion(possible spoilers enter at own risk)


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

These are just my first thoughts after 2 hours

Well, I Played through the first few levels tonight, nothing really eye opening other then the fact that the Ultra Nationalist in Russia won the war, seriously didn't see that coming.

But enough of that, onto the Multiplayer, first off your starting weapons suck ass and I mean big time, the good news is it doesn't take long to rise in rank high enough to get something worth a damn, maps are good, nothing really ground breaking, and for those that like to grenade spam, bad news you aren't Peyton Manning anymore.

Now, I'm not 100% sure because I only played an hour of the MP and it's late at night but I swear the game feels more tactical and is at a slightly slower pace and less arcade like, if you get what I'm saying.

The Perk, Kill-streak, and Aid Drops are wonderful, BTW Predator Missile FTW makes the Air strike look like child's play.

So far love it all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I woke up early this morning and played it for 30 mins before work. I played the multiplayer because i didn't have time to get into the campaign. it seemed pretty cool. i got in a fight with a guy using a shield. that was a crazy surprise.

i was playing against level 20+. total losers. :) jk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I woke up early this morning and played it for 30 mins before work. I played the multiplayer because i didn't have time to get into the campaign. it seemed pretty cool. i got in a fight with a guy using a shield. that was a crazy surprise.

i was playing against level 20+. total losers. :) jk

Total losers to be that high in 1 night haha. I only got to play multiplayer in-store. I'm waiting to beat the campaign to play it online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are just my first thoughts after 2 hours

Well, I Played through the first few levels tonight, nothing really eye opening other then the fact that the Ultra Nationalist in Russia won the war, seriously didn't see that coming.

But enough of that, onto the Multiplayer, first off your starting weapons suck ass and I mean big time, the good news is it doesn't take long to rise in rank high enough to get something worth a damn, maps are good, nothing really ground breaking, and for those that like to grenade spam, bad news you aren't Peyton Manning anymore.

Now, I'm not 100% sure because I only played an hour of the MP and it's late at night but I swear the game feels more tactical and is at a slightly slower pace and less arcade like, if you get what I'm saying.

The Perk, Kill-streak, and Aid Drops are wonderful, BTW Predator Missile FTW makes the Air strike look like child's play.

So far love it all

starting weapons dont suck ass. UMP45 is the sh*t!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like how multiplayer is more tactical. Promotes teamwork. The other ones was just shoot fast and run faster. I like how the levels are bigger. The one thing I don't like is, it gives a-holes opportunities to hide in the corner and shoot you. That's annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Played the first few levels of the campaign last night. It was pretty fun and intense at times. I'm kind of terrible at it, i died way more than any video game i've played which pissed me off. I have a hard time hearing what they are telling me to do for all the other background noise.

Can't wait to play tonight. Hopefully i can finish it soon to move to mulitplayer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...