Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers confirmed to be in Stafford discussion

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we were in that discussion, I gotta think we thought they were trying to fleece us when they told us what we had to beat from the Rams.

Oh wait, y'all serious? That's what they're offering for real?

I don't doubt that we offered first round pick.

But something along that level? Yikes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Mentor

La Pantera

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

His skill set is honestly ideal for what we run.

I don't really think he's a bridge either. Most analysts think he's got at least four or five years left in him.

In my thinking process, you have four avenues.

1, trade up in the draft and give up multiple picks for a young 'gamble '

2, roll with teddy and hope for over all improvements

3, give up multiple picks and possibly players for a young highly touted player, with 8-10 years left. Establish instant winning expectations

4, give up a pick, maybe two for an established  vet with the hopes of early success, along high expectations

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

In my thinking process, you have four avenues.

1, trade up in the draft and give up multiple picks for a young 'gamble '

2, roll with teddy and hope for over all improvements

3, give up multiple picks and possibly players for a young highly touted player, with 8-10 years left. Establish instant winning expectations

4, give up a pick, maybe two for an established  vet with the hopes of early success, along high expectations

From what I've been reading, it sounds like we had pretty strong interest in Stafford.

I'm not at all sure where we go from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've been reading, it sounds like we had pretty strong interest in Stafford.

I'm not at all sure where we go from here.

Keep monitoring the Watson situation, but probably the draft. Outside chance we show some interest in Trubisky, but I really think and hope we're done trying to go the mid-level vet FA route. QB is the one position where you pretty much have to have a stud.

I think we go into the draft planning on being aggressive if we feel the need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Keep monitoring the Watson situation, but probably the draft. Outside chance we show some interest in Trubisky, but I really think and hope we're done trying to go the mid-level vet FA route. QB is the one position where you pretty much have to have a stud.

I think we go into the draft planning on being aggressive if we feel the need.

Do we really have the capital to do that though?

I wasn't a real big believer in the possibility of getting Watson anyway, but after today I just can't see it. Trubisky? I suppose it's possible if we're interested.

I'm starting to think if Rhule really does believe in Mac Jones (and there's evidence to that effect) he's the guy. Maybe not at #8 but who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Mentor

La Pantera

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've been reading, it sounds like we had pretty strong interest in Stafford.

I'm not at all sure where we go from here.

Yeah I quoted this before I read the goff/Stafford thread. Imo that was our best 'value' option. Now I think we give up the farm for Watson. Give up the farm for #3 or hope someone falls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Mentor

La Pantera

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Keep monitoring the Watson situation, but probably the draft. Outside chance we show some interest in Trubisky, but I really think and hope we're done trying to go the mid-level vet FA route. QB is the one position where you pretty much have to have a stud.

I think we go into the draft planning on being aggressive if we feel the need.

 

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Keep monitoring the Watson situation, but probably the draft. Outside chance we show some interest in Trubisky, but I really think and hope we're done trying to go the mid-level vet FA route. QB is the one position where you pretty much have to have a stud.

I think we go into the draft planning on being aggressive if we feel the need.

I could see us signing turdbitchki as 3rd and see if he can improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Do we really have the capital to do that though?

I wasn't a real big believer in the possibility of getting Watson anyway, but after today I just can't see it. Trubisky? I suppose it's possible if we're interested.

I'm starting to think if Rhule really does believe in Mac Jones (and there's evidence to that effect) he's the guy. Maybe not at #8 but who knows?

I think if he gets duped into that then the Rhule era will be a bust. The QB position is the one position you can't play the "coach 'em up" game. You need elite talent at that position. I really hope the failed Teddy experiment showed them that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Getting some details filled in now....

Additionally, Schefter confirms that all seven of the teams who were in heavy talks with Detroit offered at least a first round pick, and more.

So yeah, it looks like we were ready to offer #8, plus...

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Do we really have the capital to do that though?

I wasn't a real big believer in the possibility of getting Watson anyway, but after today I just can't see it. Trubisky? I suppose it's possible if we're interested.

I'm starting to think if Rhule really does believe in Mac Jones (and there's evidence to that effect) he's the guy. Maybe not at #8 but who knows?

Not even enough capital to pick up the phone. It isn’t realistic any any sense out outside of EA Sports.

You either have your guy at 8 or trade down.

From all I’ve heard from Rhule about trading down, being able to hit on more guys with more picks, and the fact he wanted to due it last year, I truly believe is a QB isn’t there at 8 they’re trading down and either take a late QB or figure it out this year. That also matches a long term plan Rhule wants.

All this FA trade QB talk is nonsense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
La Pantera Mentor

La Pantera

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think Watson is gonna happen.

 

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Getting some details filled in now....

Additionally, Schefter confirms that all seven of the teams who were in heavy talks with Detroit offered at least a first round pick, and more.

So yeah, it looks like we were ready to offer #8, plus...

Stafford takes their team to the next level. Matt has NEVER had any semblance of run game. He's going to kill in that play action based off.

Edited by La Pantera
Sorry for the double quotes
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Getting some details filled in now....

Additionally, Schefter confirms that all seven of the teams who were in heavy talks with Detroit offered at least a first round pick, and more.

So yeah, it looks like we were ready to offer #8, plus...

Meh, could’ve been a next years first.

Still think they weren’t as serious as the other teams and just seeing if they could get him for cheap/feeling out what it’d cost/being ‘involved in every move’ etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Stafford takes their team to the next level. Matt has NEVER had any semblance of run game. He's going to kill in that play action based off.

The Rams are definitely built to win now.

Whether they're built to be successful in the long term is a separate question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Panthers HC Dave Canales hints at adding more weapons for QB Bryce Young

      By strato · Posted

      I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • Raskle
      2025 Draft Re-Grades (Or, One Idiot Doubles Down)

      By Raskle · Posted

      How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • Basbear
      Who was the better HC - Rivera or McDermott?

      By Basbear · Posted

      I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...