Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurricanes at Blue Jackets Predictions, Chatter, Series Thread 2/7-2/8


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Athletic has a good breakdown.. They had people being trained on video review, the wrong guys made the call. They knew they had it wrong almost immediately.. Once that pucked dropped it was a done deal. 

The NHL should have intervened right then rather than waiting till the intermission.  Would have been a real kick in the junk if they let up a PP goal in addition to the bad goal. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forwards

Svechnikov-Aho-McGinn
Niederreiter-Trocheck-Teravainen
Dzingel-Staal-Foegele
Martinook-Geekie-Fast

Defensemen

Slavin-Pesce
Skjei-Hamilton
Gardiner-Fleury

Goalies

Nedeljkovic
Reimer

No changes besides starting Ned tonight.

______

COLUMBUS - After a scintillating Sunday afternoon tilt, the stage is set for a rematch between the Carolina Hurricanes and Columbus Blue Jackets.


The Match-Up

Carolina Hurricanes (7-2-0, 14 points) at Columbus Blue Jackets (5-5-3, 13 points)

Monday, Jan. 8, 7 p.m.

Watch: FOX Sports Carolinas, FOX Sports GO

Listen: 99.9 FM The Fan, Hurricanes.com/Listen, Hurricanes app

14: With a 7-2-0 record, the Canes have set a new franchise best for most points (14) through the team's first nine games of the season. The previous best was 13 points, achieved in 2005-06 (6-2-1) and 2007-08 (5-1-3).

https://www.nhl.com/hurricanes/news/gameday-preview-carolina-hurricanes-columbus-blue-jackets/c-321196314

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

THG's review of the botched call and the details that surrounded.

 

Whether intentional or not, THG seems to indicate that the Hurricanes were somehow involved in the call. They were not. Per the Athletic article mentioned earlier:

"Nationwide Arena’s off-ice officials are in the process of training a video coordinator, a person charged with making sure NHL hockey-operations executives in Toronto can connect with NHL officials at ice level for just this kind of review, using both audio (headsets) and video (Apple iPads)."

So the Canes had no personnel involved in the decision.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...