Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QBs write up from BR


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

You're basing that on internet mock drafts when the draft always surprises people lol what do 

Are you drunk?  I am not basing anything on mock drafts.  Its a fact that 4 qbs have never gone in the top 7 and its extremely debatable at best that teams will have Lance above Fields.  But yeah, you be you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I like Lance a lot and will be happy if we draft him at 8 but everything you say here is 100% on point.

 

On the podcast to pros podcast this week they discussed how Lance runs a NFL offense and makes call at the LOS but yes he needs a lot of seasoning.  So which team ahead of us can afford that????

Atlanta with Matt Ryans contract situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

Omg I was making a skillset comparison and made some observations how they're similar beyond that, which were all true. He could absolutely go ahead of Fields

I didn’t deny that he could go ahead of Fields. You keep quoting me talking about draft position while I’ve had to write, I believe three times now, I’m not arguing about draft positioning with these QBs. It’s like you’re arguing just for the sake of arguing. I feel like if I wrote that today seems like a nice day you’d quote me and tell me I’m somehow still saying X or Y player is going in front of Lance.  Or maybe you’re so fired up over this you are quoting every reply here and not actually reading what’s being written. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, one season of great play versus one game which a team will chalk up to it being covid season and a player pressing to impress, that's a built in rationale for how a team might convince themselves to draft him in the top five, especially since he absolutely has McNair talent. 

Tbf I'm probably getting two different arguments and mixing them up, it's sunday

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I didn’t deny that he could go ahead of Fields. You keep quoting me talking about draft position while I’ve had to write, I believe three times now, I’m not arguing about draft positioning with these QBs. It’s like you’re arguing just for the sake of arguing. I feel like if I wrote that today seems like a nice day you’d quote me and tell me I’m somehow still saying X or Y player is going in front of Lance.  Or maybe you’re so fired up over this you are quoting every reply here and not actually reading what’s being written. 

You're taking this too personal jfc lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick to the plan Stan .  If 4 QBs go in the top 7 picks we can get a top rated player at their position in this draft .  We have a lot of needs and get the best player in the draft in one of those needs .  Some team will want our pick if this happens so we can trade down a little for more picks and still get a QB .  Picking a QB is a crap shoot .  We may get lucky or you may strike out . Only a few top QBs ever get a ring .

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, catnip said:

Stick to the plan Stan .  If 4 QBs go in the top 7 picks we can get a top rated player at their position in this draft .  We have a lot of needs and get the best player in the draft in one of those needs .  Some team will want our pick if this happens so we can trade down a little for more picks and still get a QB .  Picking a QB is a crap shoot .  We may get lucky or you may strike out . Only a few top QBs ever get a ring .

This guy gets it.  Great post and its what I have been screaming.  Stay at 8 and let the draft come to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a good take it really is to the point dc needs to let the world see the real byoung b/c right now everyone in the media and tepper has had blinders on when it comes to young.  Its hard to even know where the panthers are at skill player wise with such horrible qb play.  I doubt it but legette may be a probowl wr he just cant throw the ball and catch it.  I am just so sick of every excuse in the book for byoung.  LIstened to a podcast and the guy was going over how many different options byoung had on the int and all of them were ok except for the one where he threw an int.  He said the play could be run by a hs qb and they would typically make a good decision. 
    • I certainly have my complaints about Canales but I'm not ready to fire him yet for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, Tepper has made this one of the least appealing jobs in the league. Morgan and Canales are here to begin with in large part because guys higher on the wish list take other jobs. If you fire Canales you're gonna end up replacing him with another third tier candidate who wasn't being seriously considered by other teams with openings. That's just the reality of the situation right now as far as I can tell. Secondly, despite plenty of room for critique, we are 6-6 despite the worst QB play in the league. That's really damn hard to pull off in the modern NFL. Especially when your D isn't dominant. Our D is greatly improved but is still a slightly below average overall defense ranking 18th in yards per game allowed and 20th in points allowed. Going 6-6 with atrocious QB play and slightly below average defensive play is pretty damn impressive. Even more impressive when you also factor in that we're in the red on turnovers differential at -3. When you combine league worst QB play with slightly below average D and negative turnover differential honestly you'd expect to be in play for the #1 overall pick, not 6-6 and having just played a game that a win would have you leading the division. So yeah, even though I'm far from sold I advocate for patience with Canales for the time being. If you ask me if I'm bringing him back next year, I'm a yes barring a catastrophic meltdown down the stretch which admittedly is very much a possibility.
×
×
  • Create New...