Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your first three round mock and why


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'd be pretty upset with this draft. 

Me too I don't think you need 2 highly drafted DT's taken so close together.. (See Kk and Star) You run into not being able to pay one of them if their contracts come up at the same time.... And Especially when 1 was the best DT in his draft. .. You can take a flier on a lower cost FA or lower draft pick working beside your stars on defense..

Get the best or 2nd best OT and go from there..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1) The round 1 LT is a must, and the more I watch Slater, the better I feel about it.  
  • 2) A smart, elite C is something we lack and Paradis is old.  Go ahead and get one now.  If he can win the job now, cut/trade Paradis.
  • 3) Mills is a QB we can develop and trade for a first rounder or two if Darnold catches on and become good, and he could be a good backup until then.
  • 4) Twyman is a pass rushing 3 T. 
  • 5) Thomas is a solid zone CB with starting potential.  We have some older guys for now, so let's give him a year to learn.
  • 6) Shi Smith is a slot WR/return guy.
  • 7) Ball is going to start at RT in the NFL.   Let him learn for a year--playing in jumbo packages, etc. was surprised to see him at 222.

Regrets?  Did not address S, #1 CB, TE

image.png.faa709ea8d1851b1334591bf313ab3ec.png

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Shocker said:

Move down with Washington...

team logo
pfn-logo-black
  • CAR
    19.
    Christian Barmore
    DT Alabama
    trade icon
  • CAR
    39.
    Alex Leatherwood
    OT Alabama
     
  • CAR
    73.
    Jevon Holland
    S Oregon
     
  • CAR
    113.
    Deonte Brown
    OG Alabama
     
  • CAR
    151.
    Anthony Schwartz
    WR Auburn
     
  • CAR
    193.
    Kary Vincent Jr.
    CB LSU
     
  • CAR
    222.
    Israel Mukuamu
    S South Carolina
     
  • 2022 WAS 1st
  • 2022 WAS 3rd

 

 

Spot the guy that just watched the SEC last year. 😉

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming we don't receive a blockbuster offer to trade down, take Sewell / Slater at #8. Double dip in the second round with Radunz / the top OT prospect left on our board. Loser in TC moves inside to play OG. 

Third round I take the BPA, depending on who falls. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Assuming we don't receive a blockbuster offer to trade down, take Sewell / Slater at #8. Double dip in the second round with Radunz / the top OT prospect left on our board. Loser in TC moves inside to play OG. 

Third round I take the BPA, depending on who falls. 

Radunz has big concerns in terms of level of comp.  Doesn't have an ideal NFL skill set or measurables.  I would look elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Radunz has big concerns in terms of level of comp.  Doesn't have an ideal NFL skill set or measurables.  I would look elsewhere.

He has the same measurables as Sewell and Slater: 6'5" (actually taller than both), 33" arms, over 300lbs. 

Some of you were willing to throw the world at his teammate - why wasn't level of competition a concern then?

He was also voted the practice player of the week at the Senior Bowl - he more than held his own against the vaunted SEC players. 😉

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

He has the same measurables as Sewell and Slater: 6'5" (actually taller than both), 33" arms, over 300lbs. 

Some of you were willing to throw the world at his teammate - why wasn't level of competition a concern then?

He was also voted the practice player of the week at the Senior Bowl - he more than held his own against the vaunted SEC players. 😉

 

Nope dig deeper...he is right at 300 maybe a little lighter and 6’6 is really tall to be honest.  You haven’t seen him play at all.  Not many people have lol.  He will get man handled at the NFL level.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Nope dig deeper...he is right at 300 maybe a little lighter and 6’6 is really tall to be honest.  You haven’t seen him play at all.  Not many people have lol.  He will get man handled at the NFL level.

I don't make recommendations on prospects if I haven't seen them play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, but if that happens, the draft pick will look even worse for the Falcons, as instead of getting them a player that could win now, they took someone who ran off their prize FA QB after 3 years and now looks like they may be a bust. Penix was one of the more polished QB's in the draft and would have probably been a rookie starter if taken by someone with an uncertain starting QB, if he's not ready to step in and play well in year 3, then it's probably not going to work out. So the only way it helps their contract situation, is if it doesn't work out as they plan, but if it does, they're going to cut Cousins after 2 years and then have to give Penix a monster deal the following offseason.
    • QuickBooks Tool Hub [+1-844-397-7462] is a software program designed to help users troubleshoot and fix common issues with QuickBooks, a popular accounting software. It is a comprehensive collection of tools and resources that can aid in diagnosing and resolving various problems that users may encounter while using QuickBooks. The QuickBooks Tool Hub serves as a central hub that consolidates different tools and resources to streamline the troubleshooting process. It includes a variety of utilities and features to address different types of issues, making it a convenient and efficient solution for QuickBooks users. One of the key features of the QuickBooks Tool Hub is the QuickBooks Desktop Diagnostic Tool. This tool helps identify and fix common data-related issues that may be affecting the performance or functionality of QuickBooks Desktop software. It scans and repairs issues related to data integrity, network connectivity, and other technical problems, ensuring smooth operation of the software.
    • QuickBooks Enterprise support Number [+1-844-397-7462] Number is a particular assistance from Quickbooks Help Guide with examining programming related issues, fix messes up, and further foster execution. Specialists in accounting, bookkeeping, charge evaluation, and advising who work with outside clients approach the QuickBooks ProAdvisor Program. This could include recognizing and fixing programming bugs, offering foundation and course of action headings, planning associations, directing data records, and settling similitude issues. You can call this QuickBooks® Adventure Sponsorship (1844••397•7462] Number . Contact Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 9:00 PM ET and Saturday from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM ET Number. A QuickBooks master will be open to answer your requests and help you with settling any issues you could have with your QuickBooks Money Sponsorship programming. QuickBooks Adventure is an expansive financial organization and accounting programming plan expected for greater associations and affiliations. It offers many features and functionalities to help associations with managing their assets, track costs, handle finance, from that point, the sky's the cutoff.
×
×
  • Create New...