Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Round One, Game 4


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

They don't have to win a road game to take the series.

We will have to win road games to win a Stanley Cup. 

Losing to a vastly inferior opponent isn't a good start. Especially when you get dominated like we have in this game. The bulk of the quality scoring chances have been theirs and the physical play has been in their favor.

We gotta circle the wagons here or this series might be pretty rough for us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

They don't have to win a road game to take the series.

I'm well aware of that. But aren't you the guy who said there was no such thing as home ice advantage?

Carolina wins either one of their first 2 road games and the series is over.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

I'm well aware of that. But aren't you the guy who said there was no such thing as home ice advantage?

Carolina wins either one of their first 2 road games and the series is over.

No, I most certainly did not, last change and a crowd are a big deal, respectfully disagree, I don't believe in game to game momentum but in game momentum when your home is real. We outplayed them in the first and a couple of sloppy plays let their crowd get them back in it.

Edited by TrevorLaurenceTime22
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...