Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

GMFB on Sam Darnold Thursday

SBBlue

By SBBlue,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, since we are on the subject, what does his penis look like? Helmet to shaft ratio, curved/straight, more beans or more Frank's, etc?

Surely @TheSpecialJuan knows these answers.

well it's very similar to Jeffrey Epstein's egg shaped penis.

"His penis looked really weird, like he'd had an operation on it or something and I felt he was kind of embarrassed about it because he was trying to hide it." "I found it weird but I just thought, 'Whatever, who cares, he's not asking me to touch it'." 

 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I was scratching my head about them when we signed them precisely for those reasons. They were likely to be available later in free agency and potentially cheaper. It isn't like they were can't miss, high demand guys. They are really backup/depth caliber guys. 

I will be perfectly happy being wrong and Fit looking like a genius but I am just not seeing it.

It's hard to explain.

Cam and Elf were two versatile guys who are still relatively young and have the potential to develop into good players----I think they were viewed in much the same way as the staff views Darnold. I really hope the coaching staff can develop the potential they see in these guys, They seem to have a pattern of belief that they can. We will see.

This one is a head scratcher, wow GIFs - Gifvif

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, Michael G said:

Cam and Elf were two versatile guys who are still relatively young and have the potential to develop into good players----I think they were viewed in much the same way as the staff views Darnold. I really hope the coaching staff can develop the potential they see in these guys, They seem to have a pattern of belief that they can. We will see.

This one is a head scratcher, wow GIFs - Gifvif

Well, they appear to be able to coach players up, but there's a limit to it.  We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...