Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Tremble


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

Any offensive production Tommyknocker provides, in my own personal opinion, would be a bonus or bailout.

I don’t need him to be anything other than what he’s shown to be, a devastating blocker and all around enforcer.

Not since Smitty have we had a firebrand.  I want this dude to be mean as a rattle snake and twice as deadly.

Put that backer on his ass, Tommy.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

Any offensive production Tommyknocker provides, in my own personal opinion, would be a bonus or bailout.

I don’t need him to be anything other than what he’s shown to be, a devastating blocker and all around enforcer.

Not since Smitty have we had a firebrand.  I want this dude to be mean as a rattle snake and twice as deadly.

Put that backer on his ass, Tommy.

 

I hear what you're putting down. But man, if he can be a threat in teh passing game? Just think what that adds!!

 

And yeah to him spreading that attitude to his teammates. More dogs win more fights. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I hear what you're putting down. But man, if he can be a threat in teh passing game? Just think what that adds!!

 

And yeah to him spreading that attitude to his teammates. More dogs win more fights. 

I agree, what a bonus it would be.  I’m still excited to see him block.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

I agree, what a bonus it would be.  I’m still excited to see him block.

 

Lot's of things have me excited for the comint year. He is defiantly at the top of that list. It sounds as though he is working on his hands as well. If that comes to fruition. Watch out folks. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...