Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roster churn


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, My Chuck Dont Matter said:

Just because you draft a LB high didn’t mean they’ll be good. 

LB isn't usually drafted high by most successful teams simply because its a high churn low impact position. So the probability of hitting is much higher. Just like RB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Wonder if Bynes makes Perryman expendable?

Was thinking the same thing. Perryman and bynes are both strong against the run, with perryman being more explosive but bynes being (seemingly) more available.

don’t know the cap implications of moving on from perryman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jorgie said:

Was thinking the same thing. Perryman and bynes are both strong against the run, with perryman being more explosive but bynes being (seemingly) more available.

don’t know the cap implications of moving on from perryman

 

about 3 mill in dead money over this year and next year, 3 mill in cap savings for next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

about 3 mill in dead money over this year and next year, 3 mill in cap savings for next year.

Interesting.
 

I core of bynes perryman carter and shaq does feel a little better

Edited by Jorgie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...