Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Business of Disney


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

Spinning off a topic from the current Suicide Squad thread where someone talked about how nobody would buy Lucasfilm today after the mess Disney made with the most recent films.

Here's a breakdown of what Disney *paid* vs what Disney's *earned* for some of their acquisitions:

  • Marvel - cost: $4 billion.  With over 23 total films (at the time of the article), they've grossed nearly $23 billion at the box office alone
  • Lucasfilm - cost: $4 billion. Delivered five films in four years, generating a gross profit of $2 billion
  • Pixar - cost: $7.4 billion. Since the purchase, there were 16 films grossing more than $11 billion. Plus add on the uncalculatable value of the early years of John Lassiter turning around Disney Creative (before his work situation thing happened)
  • Hulu - cost: $10.5 billion. Helps solidify a streaming audience and recurring revenue
  • FOX - cost: $71.3 billion. That Gigantic Library of Content, including the original Star Wars film rights, X-Men, Fantastic Four, and Avatar.

    https://observer.com/2020/09/disney-buys-star-wars-marvel-fox-hulu-pixar-cost-box-office/
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Disney is an evil empire led by a giant mouse

Back in the late '90's-early 2000's, the Pooh franchise was bringing in more money to Disney than the "Fab Five" (including Mickey) were.

Surveys seemed to back this up, where kids didn't know anything more about Mickey than he "was at the Theme Park". All the work that Walt and company had done to brand Disney as "it all started with a mouse" (aka the Mouseketeers, the Mickey Mouse Club, etc) were seemingly all for naught.

That's what started the big big push to rebrand Mickey and Friends and introduce those characters beyond the theme park appearances while at the same time discounting/minimizing Pooh availability. The Schlesinger merch lawsuit at the same time didn't help matters.

At about the same time, a Disney exec attended a "Disney on Ice" event and saw the audience dressed in generic princess attire. A lightbulb went off, and the Disney Princess merchandise line began.

To me, the Princess moment marked a key pivot for Disney away from "family entertainment" to "let's market towards kids exclusively". With this, Disney proceeded to go down a distinct path away from product/content that would appeal to a wide mass audience with their focus on children. A trip to Walt Disney World used to be a Family Vacation, but now it's "we have to do this for the kids". 

[See also the removal of the fantastically scary Alien Encounter attraction and subsequent replacement with a Stitch overlay, complete with fart smells - as the AE attraction was "too scary for children".  Also, the reworking of "Snow White's Scary Adventures" to "Snow White's Adventures", also because kids shouldn't be "frightened" by an attraction]

LucasFilm and Marvel is one way Disney is trying to loop back to an older audience, but they're running into issues trying to shoehorn everything into an existing park experience vs perhaps finally opening the mythical "fifth gate" at Walt Disney World that would cater towards teens/adults.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2021 at 2:12 PM, Inimicus said:

This will be an unpopular opinion (especially with the Star Wars fanboys) but I think Disney has brought a lot to the things of my youth that I loved.

 

I dont have any significant complaint with any of the MCU/Star Wars franchises beyond the fact that it took me 2 different viewings of the Black Widow snore fest to see the whole film

I liked elements of Black Widow, I just wish the writers were better at working 'girl power' into a great script rather than making the whole movie ooze with cheese and smacking viewers over the head with the whole 'girls can do it!' stuff. Reminded me of Kenan's mailman character in Don't Be A Menace:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2021 at 2:12 PM, Inimicus said:

This will be an unpopular opinion (especially with the Star Wars fanboys) but I think Disney has brought a lot to the things of my youth that I loved.

 

I dont have any significant complaint with any of the MCU/Star Wars franchises beyond the fact that it took me 2 different viewings of the Black Widow snore fest to see the whole film

I didn't care for the last two Sequel films.  But the Clone Wars-Rebels-Bad Batch-Mandelorian-Rogue One...that's some of the best Star Wars made after the Empire Strikes Back.  Even Solo was better than I expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind that Disney bought up a bunch of stuff because, in truth, they were buying legacy brands that needed to sell and could have gone to companies with less commitment to product and longevity. Look at Marvel --  no one else had the deep wallets to do what they did (basically risking a ton on Ironman -- an unappealing character outside of the Spiderman/Fantastic Four/X-Men realms and believing in rehabbing Robert Downey Jr. and (at that time) relative unknown Jon Favreau). 

Really, just look at how badly other big film companies had screwed up Marvel characters (and DC, too). And Lucasfilm? I think it was showing that George Lucas needed to have the franchise taken off his hands and put into a better place.

But with all of this, it has not reduced the amount of content being created out there. For all the screams of "we will all be sheep watching nothing but Disney properties" there's just more and more and more stuff being created out there. New ideas, new ways of telling stories, new stars in the making. They can keep buying stuff but  we're living in one of the greatest times ever for creative types -- there's a voracious market, there are unlimited outlets and so much money to be made --  either from the big studios, streaming services, and even the  tiny patreon and youtube vehicles.

It's a good time to be alive if you want to be entertained. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's a very incorrect statement right off the bat, coaches get fired for winning ugly all the time.  Every coach of a playoff team that then gets fired, got fired because they won ugly and didn't improve their players enough to win in the postseason. Guys like Andy Reid have been fired for "winning ugly" like you said, because they kept winning in spite of the improvement of their players. Also, "this is a fanbase starved for wins" is a statement I also don't agree with, I'm not "starved for wins", I'm "starved for a winning and contending franchise" which are two VERY different things. If the team and fans just want to win some games, then that's a loser mentality, sorry, but it is.  We should want to contend, not win a handful of games.  Every time this comes up I point back to the Lions the last 5 years or so.  They were losing games but improving every week while doing so a few years back.  THAT is how you improve as a franchise and move the needle towards contending, not winning games ugly.
    • Good lord. I don’t think I have ever seen a hole that open. 
    • this is true.  But NFL Ss and defenses are actively taking that away and playing to take them away vs most teams.  The problem thus far in BY's career......is they are cheating and not respecting the deep game which makes the smaller/mid range game harder to pull off.  and Dallas is an anomaly game.  using those random games that run counter to vast work......doesn't really change the discussion/issues in Carolina.  Bryce Young took the shots this week because they were not just NFL open but college open.    Wide open dudes downfield that really were coverage busts/issues. 
×
×
  • Create New...