Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers and WR Robby Anderson have agreed to a 2-year, $29.5 million extension, per source.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Sorry, but it is still a shade under $15M a year for two more years. Tearing up this year’s deal doesn’t make the cost cheaper. That’s just spacing out the cap hits how they want. $15M a year is basically top tier WR2 money like Kupp and Godwin. He’s below those guys and above the next tier. $12-13M is a fair deal for him so it’s a slight overpay but it’s a 2 year deal and since DJ has his 5th year option, we won’t ever have a big cap hit at WR and you’ve got extra time for Marshall and Smith to get better. Worst case is we pay $20M for just 2022 and Marshall and possibly Smith have relegated Robby to an expensive WR3 for one year.

The biggest issue I see with this is that I would have waited. It’s a lot of money to waste if Marshall and possibly Smith look phenomenal and/or Darnold looks like crap. Paying Robby a lot in 2022/2023 for lower production and/or while we have to get a new QB is something you could have avoided if you let the season play out while talking extension.

Overall, not a bad deal but maybe premature and a little overpay.

Robby doesnt have a cap hit over 13 million for any of the next 3 years.  

12or 12.5 this year (can't remember)

13 next year

12 the following year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Robby doesnt have a cap hit over 13 million for any of the next 3 years.  

12or 12.5 this year (can't remember)

13 next year

12 the following year. 

Please show the verified structure that has been released. Just because a guy on the internet guessed(poorly) doesn’t make it true. Once again, his cap hit was 12M before yesterday. How is adding 4.5M going to keep it the same? If not, how are the 2022-23 cap hits totaling 25M? Most reporters have no clue how to report on contracts. 

 

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Please show the verified structure that has been released. Just because a guy on the internet guessed(poorly) doesn’t make it true. Once again, his cap hit was 12M before yesterday. How is adding 4.5M going to keep it the same? If not, how are the 2022-23 cap hits totaling 25M? Most reporters have no clue how to report on contracts. 

 

     

His cap hit was not 12 mil before yesterday.  It was 8.  They added 4.5 to that to bring it to 12.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

His cap hit was not 12 mil before yesterday.  It was 8.  They added 4.5 to that to bring it to 12.5

It was??????

Current Contract

(UFA, signed 2020)

 

Year Cap
Number
Dead Money & Cap Savings
Cut (pre-June 1)Cut (post-June 1)Trade (pre-June 1)Trade (post-June 1)RestructureExtension 
Total $20,000,000
2020 $8,000,000    
2021 $12,000,000
$4,000,000
$8,000,000


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

It was??????

Current Contract

(UFA, signed 2020)

 

Year Cap
Number
Dead Money & Cap Savings
Cut (pre-June 1)Cut (post-June 1)Trade (pre-June 1)Trade (post-June 1)RestructureExtension 
Total $20,000,000
2020 $8,000,000    
2021 $12,000,000
$4,000,000
$8,000,000


 

 

8 million dollar base salary.  8 million dollar signing bonus, spread out over 2 years of the contract, for a 12 million dollar cap hit prior to his new deal yesterday. 

Im not professing to being a contract or cap expert.  So I guess you're right.  I'm wrong. All I know is that they were saying yesterday at the time he signed it that his salary went from 8 mil this year to 12.5, as they added 4.5 to his salary this year.  Nowhere was it mentioned that his salary would be anywhere close to 16 mil this year. 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/robby-anderson-19352/

Edited by joemac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

8 million dollar base salary.  8 million dollar signing bonus, spread out over 2 years of the contract, for a 12 million dollar cap hit prior to his new deal yesterday. 

Exactly. So how are you proposing adding 4.5M to this year, thus making the others add up to only 25M. And it stays at 12 or 12.5M? You just typed out the hole in your theory. 
 

 In your last two posts you have said the exact opposite in each. Nice. 

Edited by Toomers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Exactly. So how are you proposing adding 4.5M to this year, thus making the others add up to only 25M. And it stays at 12 or 12.5M? You just typed out the hole in your theory. 
 

 In your last two posts you have said the exact opposite in each. Nice. 

OK.  Go back and reread my post.  Like I said, I guess you are right and I am wrong.  Does that make you happy?  I can admit when I am wrong.  And it doesn't really matter one way or another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

OK.  Go back and reread my post.  Like I said, I guess you are right and I am wrong.  Does that make you happy?  I can admit when I am wrong.  And it doesn't really matter one way or another. 

And that was edited in after my response was written. So what was I supposed to think? You posted opposite statements like I just didn’t say the same thing. Then don’t bring up false info if it don’t matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

He was going to get that for this season anyway.  

And he still has 4M of guaranteed signing bonus from his first contract. Just as was posted in the posts right before yours. His cap hit was 12M for this year BEFORE anything signed yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

I wasn’t worried about cap. I was responding to someone acting like we are paying him less per year because we tore up the existing contract. At the end of the day we added two years to his current deal for $29.5. The cap/contract amount per year wrangling aside, we are still paying him an average of $14.75M per year extra for 2022 and 2023.

The funny thing is that cap rolls over so adding money to 2021 instead of 2022 is a wash because you are reducing the rollover by the same amount that you now have in extra 2022 room.

9FEFDA66-3533-4791-AB02-72436470447B.gif.c91248ff4400471abfbf50304101db50.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And he still has 4M of guaranteed signing bonus from his first contract. Just as was posted in the posts right before yours. His cap hit was 12M for this year BEFORE anything signed yesterday. 

You seem to care more about how the books are kept than what the value of the contract is.  He is being paid an average salary of 12.5 mil a season for 3 seasons.  I'm not sure why you are focusing on his last contract is no longer in play.   The past signing bonus has already been paid.  I couldn't care less how its accounted for on paper.

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...