Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They are really pushing the Diggs shutdown Moore narrative


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, BrianS said:

That first INT, a couple things.

They ran that play a series or two earlier, but with DJ running the router instead of Robby.  DJ was open on the play, but Sam had a ton of pressure and overthrew it a bit. 

I'll bet that when they talked about it they told Sam "This was open and we're going to go to it again".  I say that because Sam largely just locked on to the receiver.  He glanced once at the flat, but there was definitely no progression read there.

It's a shame too, because if he had followed the progression instead, DJ was WIDE (*@ OPEN deep.

Darnold said he threw it a second too early.  If he had waited one more second Robby would have been open.  I saw the clip on twitter, and yeah he's right.  It would have been a TD if he had waited one more second to throw, instead it went straight at the CB in the passing lane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luciu5 said:

Darnold said he threw it a second too early.  If he had waited one more second Robby would have been open.  I saw the clip on twitter, and yeah he's right.  It would have been a TD if he had waited one more second to throw, instead it went straight at the CB in the passing lane.

Not sure he had another second tho, that pocket was looking pretty grim by the time he threw it.  😞

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diggs is a decent player for sure, but he benefited by jumping every route, which most CB's cannot do.

But with our extraordinary Oline efforts giving Sam .4 seconds to get rid of the ball, everyone knew what was coming.  Sam might have just chucked it high or taken the sack, but he will clean that up.

Jets game was the same, Sam got rid of the ball very quickly, lots out quick passes, but remember, we had no CMC this past Sunday, so Diggs and the announcers and everyone were just waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2021 at 9:37 AM, Harbingers said:

It was also garbage time to the cowboys and they went prevent. 
 

I agree he’s had an outstanding season so far. But DJ was the least of our worries, really hard to get a pass to him when you have a defensive linemen in your face in 1.5 seconds. 

Garbage time....TO THE COWBOYS, not to us.

And that decision almost came back to bite them in the ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2021 at 11:06 AM, BrianS said:

Not sure he had another second tho, that pocket was looking pretty grim by the time he threw it.  😞

You are correct.  He got hit a second after he released the ball so it would've been a sack.    This goddamn O-Line...  smh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...