Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Erving vs Other 2021 Free Agents


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mage said:

Yeah for 1st round picks.

The Rams, who have an excellent line,  traded a 5th with Cleveland for OG Austin Corbett (70.9 pff).  

The Eagles traded OT Matt Pryor(71 pff ) and a 7th to the Colts for a 6th pick

It happens.   Just like some teams get a Stephan Gilmore for a 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Toomers said:

Well he made for his horrible ability to cover any eligible receiver by putting full effort into the next missed tackle. 

"It is what it is. Thankfully the Panthers didn’t sign Al Villanueva. Dude is bad guy to have around in the locker room and def a selfish player who doesn’t put the team first due to his own personal agenda."  was being discussed. Controversy and drama. 

I like how you moved the goalposts on that answer. We were talking about controversial players and you  respond with play on the field. You know that's not what we were talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, @bonafidebanter said:

How was Eric Reid "bad"? I really want to know.

Reid had a different QB than the team, wanted the team to sign Kap non-stop, even publicly said so after a couple games. Games that other QBs gave their all. Thats bad for a locker room not having your QBs back. Even worse when its a defensive players, cause its starts a fugly war of O vs D...The same thing Rhule was trying to end this past week.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...