Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alec Baldwin


Brooklyn 3.0
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

While he might not have pulled the trigger, he did admit to pulling back the hammer on the gun while working with Hutchins to frame the scene they were rehearsing.

There's something in this, too.He said he was not even pointing it towards her, but she wanted to be able to see him cock the gun. So he turned towards her. The very worst view of cocking the gun.

 And he could easily have fired without touching the trigger. If you pull the hammer back and let go, you fired the gun. You just didn't cock it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I love how PhillyB tries to debate with intelligence some of the time, but then results to childish insults the rest of the time. Takes any credibility he may have away.

He’s just a condescending little sh!t.  I lost all respect for him a long time ago.  

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just have to say, I'm very surprised that someone who is very much a creation of an industry that glorifies gun violence while at that same time rarely bypassing an opportunity to lecture the peasant public about gun violence and gun control would ultimately end up involved in a shooting incident on set and then accept absolutely zero blame while directing all blame at anyone other than himself. I mean, that's a very on brand stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just have to say, I'm very surprised that someone who is very much a creation of an industry that glorifies gun violence while at that same time rarely bypassing an opportunity to lecture the peasant public about gun violence and gun control would ultimately end up involved in a shooting incident on set and then accept absolutely zero blame while directing all blame at anyone other than himself. I mean, that's a very on brand stance.

Baldwin or Philly B?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just have to say, I'm very surprised that someone who is very much a creation of an industry that glorifies gun violence while at that same time rarely bypassing an opportunity to lecture the peasant public about gun violence and gun control would ultimately end up involved in a shooting incident on set and then accept absolutely zero blame while directing all blame at anyone other than himself. I mean, that's a very on brand stance.

alec baldwin being a hypocrite (he is, and there's a lot of irony in it) is totally different than the assertion that putting guns in movies is hypocritical if you are pro gun control.

is caraveggio a hypocrite for supposedly being anti-murder but then painting the beheading of st. john the baptist?

is rob reiner a hypocrite for thinking kids should resolve conflicts peacefully but featuring kids in fistfights in stand by me?

do you see how ridiculous this gets when you frame depiction as action? it's foundationally dumb. and you know it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

alec baldwin being a hypocrite (he is, and there's a lot of irony in it) is totally different than the assertion that putting guns in movies is hypocritical if you are pro gun control.

is caraveggio a hypocrite for supposedly being anti-murder but then painting the beheading of st. john the baptist?

is rob reiner a hypocrite for thinking kids should resolve conflicts peacefully but featuring kids in fistfights in stand by me?

do you see how ridiculous this gets when you frame depiction as action? it's foundationally dumb. and you know it 

Not simply putting guns in movies. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking specifically about movies that glorify gun violence and there's a lot of them. I don't think you get to make movies like say a John Wick for instance and then also turn around and get on a soapbox and lecture the public about the dangers of guns and the need for more gun control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not simply putting guns in movies. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking specifically about movies that glorify gun violence and there's a lot of them. I don't think you get to make movies like say a John Wick for instance and then also turn around and get on a soapbox and lecture the public about the dangers of guns and the need for more gun control.

john wick is dystopian lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It puts more pressure on being right, I always feel trading back is the move 97/100 times. There are times where you fall in love and if that guy is only 7 spots away and the cost is only a 6th or pick swap......why not?? so long the cost is low, Im more willing to do so.  Still one of the best teams at trading back and they torn apart the Panthers on those trades; Pats. You still have to pick the players, that's what happens. In theory you should also add picks, but it does get to point of eight 3rd rounders or two late 1st and a 2nd?? I mean every draft is different, so the talent maybe not fall off a cliff after pick 50. Case by case deal, but vastly I prefer to trade back.....another curve if you trade back and the scouts/coaches have not planned for it. You have to be ready and know the spot you are trading too (everyone). Just like trading out of 1st round two weeks before the draft, that hurts your team as they have been focused on pick 10 and now its wait until pick 42.... 
    • 🏈 Offense QB: Jack Trudeau RB: Derek Loville FB: Howard Griffith WR: Mark Carrier WR: Willie Green TE: Wesley Walls LT: Todd Steussie LG: Matt Elliott 😄 Jeff Christy RG: Lance Scott RT: Blake Brockermeyer 🛡️ Defense DE: Kevin Greene DT: Eric Swann DT: Greg Kragen DE: Frank Kearse OLB: Lamar Lathon MLB: Sam Mills OLB: Michael Barrow CB: Tyrone Poole CB: Richard Buckner S: Brett Maxie S: Chad Cota
    • IDK, just I know these mock drafts are time "wasters" and even more before FA cause that does change a huge portion of the needs. I think Panthers are in on Lloyd, but just like Milton Williams if the numbers get too high they will change course and still sign one of the lesser ILB. I've also seen reports Panthers want boom back as well, but as STer/backup.   Personally Ive put Wallance in the Ickey, Brooks zone....... Acting like he's not on the team and if he shows out during OTAs, mini, and TC GREEEAT!!! I feel Panthers need to sign at least one and draft 1-2....hell even add another Bam-like UDFA in the UD pool too. Trade is on the table, there have been many trades than past years......   Given the team history, the LB corp is saddest ever. Still the league isnt paying ILB and Panthers finally got with that trend. I do feel Evero wants a IBL that can blitz and everyone wants one able to pass cover.  I feel no matter what, Panthers will draft one in the mid rounds and add a couple in the UDFA class. 
×
×
  • Create New...