Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Too early to say this team is done?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Four straight losses, all to teams we should’ve beat and especially a Giants team who couldn’t get out of their own way.

I can realistically see us losing to the Cons next week and possibility not winning another game.

I hate being pessimistic but when you look at our remaining schedule I honestly can’t see where the next win comes from….maybe WFT? And it’s a shame because the D has played solid overall with the exception of Dallas and Minny. Our O is god awful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, T-Wazzle said:

We'll win again.  Toward the end of the season when we're thinking we'll get a top 5 draft pick, then TB puts in all their scrubs and want to get healthy for the playoffs... we'll win enough to drop from the 4th or 5th pick down to the 9th or 10th.  

Something like that.

Then draft a corner.

At this point I don’t even think we can beat their scrubs or anyone else’s for that matter. The D is going to be completely worn down by the time the O can figure out how to sustain a drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...