Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RBA, “Nino Could Be Out For A While”

MillionDollarCam

By MillionDollarCam,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted

 

Well Jarvis, you’re up kid…

Keep in mind, at 10 games played he would burn his first year of his ELC.

Jarvis’ 10th game would be Nov. 22nd.

It looked like Nino did some damage to his ankle which would more than likely be a minimum of three weeks.

As Jarvis gets close to the 10 game threshold, it will be interesting to see if they burn his first year or if they call up a veteran like C.J. Smith, Stefan Noesen, or Andrew Poturalski.

Jamieson Rees would have been an option but he just had knee surgery.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

 

Well Jarvis, you’re up kid…

Keep in mind, at 10 games played he would burn his first year of his ELC.

Jarvis’ 10th game would be Nov. 22nd.

It looked like Nino did some damage to his ankle which would more than likely be a minimum of three weeks.

As Jarvis gets close to the 10 game threshold, it will be interesting to see if they burn his first year or if they call up a veteran like C.J. Smith, Stefan Noesen, or Andrew Poturalski.

Jamieson Rees would have been an option but he just had knee surgery.

Jarvis is extremely talented he currently has the ability to make it worth it to burn that year if he plays well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Jarvis is extremely talented he currently has the ability to make it worth it to burn that year if he plays well.

No doubt that Jarvis will be a good player but I think the Canes are thinking of it from a long-term contract perspective.

Ultimately I think it depends on how significant Nino’s injury is.

If he’s looking at a month and a half or so then I wouldn’t be surprised if Jarvis gets 9 games and then the Canes call up someone like C.J. Smith and roll with:

KK - Aho - Turbo

Svech - Trocheck - Necas

Marty - Staal - Fast

Smith - Stepan - Lorentz

I don’t think the Canes really want to burn one of Jarvis’ years due to what this off-season might look like:

RFA’s:

Steven Lorentz - Try to re-sign for around 2x$1.35M

Martin Necas - Try to re-sign for around 5x$6M

Jesperi Kotkaniemi - Try to re-sign for around 3x$4M

Ethan Bear - Try to re-sign for around 3x$3.5

UFA’s:

Vincent Trocheck - Try to re-sign for around 5x$6M

Tony DeAngelo - Try to re-sign for around 3x$5M

Ian Cole - Try to re-sign for around 1x$1.5M

Nino Niederreiter - Won’t be able to afford

Derek Stepan - Do not re-sign

Brendan Smith - Do not re-sign

Buy-Out’s:

Jake Gardiner 

All these calculations put us right at the projected $82.5M salary cap. This means the rest of the roster will have to be filled out by ELC guys and having them under control for three years as opposed to just two would be huge.

Next years lineup could look something like this:

KK - Aho - Turbo

Svech - Trocheck - Necas

Jarvis - Staal - Fast

Marty - Drury - Lorentz

Rees

Slavin - Bear

Skjei - Pesce

Cole - DeAngelo

Keane

Andersen

Raanta

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Dunn said:

I'm still somewhat of a newb when it comes to bringing guys up etc...why hasn't Suzuki had a look yet?  Drafted in 2019 and put up some really solid points where he's been playing. 

We have a log jam down the middle with Aho, Trocheck, Staal, and Stepan.

Lorentz, Martinook, Jarvis, Necas, and Kotkaniemi can also play center if needed.

What really hurt Ryan was that he had a serious eye injury in 2019 and it’s taken him a while to regain his form.

Unfortunately, during that time, Jack Drury has really progressed and has more than likely jumped Suzuki in the pecking order.

I think Ryan projects as a 3C in the NHL and unfortunately for him that position is occupied by Jordan Staal for at the very least this year and next year.

I would not be surprised if he is used as a piece to facilitate a trade in the coming years as the Canes will still have a lot of young center depth.

Centers Aged 21 or Under

Jesperi Kotkaniemi (21)

Seth Jarvis (19)

Jack Drury (21)

Jamieson Rees (20)

Vasiliy Ponomarev (19)

Blake Murray (20)

Justin Robidas (18)

 

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted

No skate or presser today and no other roster move so far, and I assume no morning skate tomorrow. We can only assume Jarvis will be covering for Nino and Raanta will probably be back in net. 
 

Im kinda split on tossing Jarvis on 3rd line or putting up Marty or Lorentz. We know what we are gonna get from Marty, so seeing Lorentz or Jarvis up there might be the way to go. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

No skate or presser today and no other roster move so far, and I assume no morning skate tomorrow. We can only assume Jarvis will be covering for Nino and Raanta will probably be back in net. 
 

Im kinda split on tossing Jarvis on 3rd line or putting up Marty or Lorentz. We know what we are gonna get from Marty, so seeing Lorentz or Jarvis up there might be the way to go. 

I think Marty gets bumped up personally.

The Staal line is used as the checking line so Marty’s game fits in well there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I think Marty gets bumped up personally.

The Staal line is used as the checking line so Marty’s game fits in well there.

I don’t disagree for Chicago in Chicago, FL and TB for sure but since we got another clinic game vs Arizona who only put up 16 shots on Washington last night. We might as well see how we look with one of the other two up there. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...