Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Turner>Joe Brady


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

If the defensive line was as bad as the offensive line this defense would be one of the worst in the league.

The OL was not the problem today.  Their OL performed worse than ours, with a worse QB, worse RB and a comparable reciever.

Turner targeted our weaknesses.

Joe Brady picked his nose.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

If the defensive line was as bad as the offensive line this defense would be one of the worst in the league.

As I said, you can't name a single game where the O saved us.   You can blame the OL in many games, but not today.  They did better than the WFT OL who allowed more sacks, hits and hurries than ours today.

Turner did more with much much less.

Joe Brady is a child looking lost.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

They scored 27 points.  3 of the points they got when they took over in field goal range, giving us a SECOND attempt to try to score to win the game.

We had two attempts at a game winning drive and Joe Brady was lost.

We needed 3 yards on 3rd down two different times and couldn't get it in two downs each time.

The offense has been BAD all season.

We threw for 187 yards today against the 30TH RANKED PASSING D.
Last week we threw for 175 yards against the Cards.
Sam threw for 172 yards against the Pats.

Cam looked good.  CMC looked good.  The OL looked serviceable.

Joe Brady's offense didn't work with Teddy, it didn't work with Sam, it didn't work with PJ and it doesn't work with Cam.

How many QB's will we go through before people catch on that Joe Brady is a horrible OC?

 

I also think Brady sucks and teams have had him figured out since the Cowboys game.  However we did go like 12 quarters or something without a touchdown til Cam got here. Just seeing catchable balls was an improvement but the predictable routes CB's sit on is still killing us. Brady has no plays drawn up to come from behind, might as well go no huddle backyard football when behind 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

.  However we did go like 12 quarters or something without a touchdown til Cam got here. Just seeing catchable balls was an improvement but the predictable routes CB's sit on is still killing us. Brady has no plays drawn up to come from behind, might as well go no huddle backyard football when behind 

Oh I agree that Cam>>>>>>>Darnold.  I don't want to go back.

We had the better performing OL, better QB, better RB and as good or better receivers and yet they had more yards rushing, passing and more points.

We had two clear attempts at a game winning drive and Joe Brady was hiding under the table cowering.

We need to part ways with Joe Brady.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Oh I agree that Cam>>>>>>>Darnold.  I don't want to go back.

We had the better performing OL, better QB, better RB and as good or better receivers and yet they had more yards rushing, passing and more points.

We had two clear attempts at a game winning drive and Joe Brady was hiding under the table cowering.

We need to part ways with Joe Brady.

Yup, through 3 QB's we won't throw deep, that's on Brady. Using Robby and DJ on comeback routes is a waste of talent, you saw what taking deeps shots on Donte looked like, and Donte is probably better than all of their corners

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Agree with this, look at the Youtube highlights, their OL destroyed our DL pretty much all game except those coverage sacks

Ignore him

He just follows me around trying to argue every little point

We had more sacks, more hits and more hurries, but he wants to believe our OL performed worse.  

He's a Brady lover.  Its hard to understand what he is saying sometimes because his voice is muffled by Brady's cheeks.

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Agree with this, look at the Youtube highlights, their OL destroyed our DL pretty much all game except those coverage sacks

Right I mean two things can be true simultaneously like Joe Brady is in over his head and our oline is still not anywhere near what it should be. This is why we look somewhat serviceable with a qb like Cam. That poster is honestly a borderline lunatic who won't admit faults about the oline for some odd reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Right I mean two things can be true simultaneously like Joe Brady is in over his head and our oline is still not anywhere near what it should be. This is why we look somewhat serviceable with a qb like Cam. That poster is honestly a borderline lunatic who won't admit faults about the oline for some odd reason.

Yup, we honestly didn't try to run the ball today/reverted to dumb screen passes etc but it's hard to tell without seeing more film. Only 10 rtotal ushes when the game was pretty close the whole time lost us that time of possession. We averaged 6 yards a carry and just went away from it yet again thanks to Brady. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I’ll never give Shula or Rivera credit for Cam’s achievements. But your point isn’t invalid, and I know. But that was all Cam heroics

I agree that Cam carried Shula.  So far, Cam+CMC+DjMoore couldn't carry Brady.    The point isn't to say how good Shula was, its to say how BAD Brady is.  His checkdown offense sucks.  He has never been a good OC anywhere and needs to be fired.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
    • I mean, first of all, I'm not the one who initially said he was a life long fan, it was in that tweet in the OP. But more importantly, "life long fan" is a relative term, especially for a franchise like the Panthers.  I think anyone who was say, 10-12 or younger when the franchise started, and been a fan since the start, could claim to be a life long fan. I'm 38, been a fan of the team since year 1 even though I'm not even from the Carolinas, after almost 30 years of fandom and following them since the beginning, I have no issue saying I'm a life long Panthers fan. Very possible his dad is say around 40 years old and been a Panthers fan since the start.  And even if he's a little older, if you're a fan of a team for 30 out of your say 45ish years of life... that's "life long" in that instance.
×
×
  • Create New...