Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions: need beef on the Dline


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's approaching 30% of the time though. Even if you win your division you're going to have to win three games against playoff caliber teams. Odds are pretty decent one of those teams is going to curb stomp you in the trenches. It needs to get addressed in the off-season.

Jesus christ.. What is the expectation here?? 

No defense in this league this year is stopping every offense they have faced... 

This Defense is still young ass hell it isn't the 99 Ravens or 86 Bears.. 

70% effectiveness isn't bad for a defense so young and spent most the season carrying a inept offense...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, AceMan said:

We should be 8-3 and a clear playoff team according to this logic then

So the other half of the team don't count??

You do know there is a thing called offense in football  right??

See how stupid you look when you try to act smart?? 

Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Jesus christ.. What is the expectation here?? 

No defense in this league this year is stopping every offense they have faced... 

This Defense is still young ass hell it isn't the 99 Ravens or 86 Bears.. 

70% effectiveness isn't bad for a defense so young and spent most the season carrying a inept offense...

We're 24th in the league in rushing yards allowed. It's clearly a problem.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're 24th in the league in rushing yards allowed. It's clearly a problem.

Outsiders got them at 19..

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-rushing-yards-per-game

And are we going to negate the fact that for 9 weeks the offense left them on the field for teams to run on them towards the end of the game??

At some point you have to add context when using stats..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Outsiders got them at 19..

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-rushing-yards-per-game

And are we going to negate the fact that for 9 weeks the offense left them on the field for teams to run on them towards the end of the game??

At some point you have to add context when using stats..

The offense has been much better since bringing Cam back. Honestly, our rush D is our biggest weakness since then.

It's okay man. The team isn't perfect. Some criticism is okay. I mean, we're 5-6. Clearly there's some aspects of the team that need improvement.

We're 19th in average tugging yards allowed per game. We're 24th in actual rushing yards allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The offense has been much better since bringing Cam back. Honestly, our rush D is our biggest weakness since then.

It's okay man. The team isn't perfect. Some criticism is okay. I mean, we're 5-6. Clearly there's some aspects of the team that need improvement.

We're 19th in average tugging yards allowed per game. We're 24th in actual rushing yards allowed.

Wait Limmy the rankings are based on the season so far not the last 2 games..

Since Cam been back they stuffed the Cardinals and got beat up by the Team..

But the other 9 games they were dealing with a Darnold led offense and no complimentary Football right??

That will effect any defenses numbers??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

3 out of 11 games they gotten beaten in the trenches can we stop going overboard...

The Panthers have been beaten in the trenches more than 3 times. In every loss, the Panthers have given up at least 90 yards rushing. The Eagles being the team that didn't rush for over 100 yards. In the wins, the Panthers have kept teams under 90 yards rushing. Teams being able to run on the Panthers is more than a trend, it's the same problem the Manning era Colts had with their smaller front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s the gap integrity that fails in Phil Snow’s scheme when teams have an offensive line that can block guys man on man and win. In a Rivera style defense at least in the earlier days with Star and KK, you could stop the run with gap integrity and good linebacker play because of the more traditional alignments, even against a good offensive line that bodied them up.

Now the Phil Snow defense relies more on gimmicks, weird alignments, and stunts to put guys in position to make a play in the run game and to fill the gaps. It leaves big wide open holes for 10 yard games when your d-line doesn’t outright win at the point of attack and puts an offensive lineman on a linebacker a lot of the time. Snow’s defense has worked great at stopping some zone run teams, and teams with inferior offensive linemen that could be beat one on one. Against teams that run the ball well with straight man on man blocking like Dallas or Minnesota the results were absolutely horrendous. Washington and New England had a similar strategy to great success.

The blueprint is out there, but luckily not all teams have the offensive lineman to pull it off. The Panthers D-line will win against some teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...