Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, joemac said:

Personally I think the exact opposite. Fitterer is the lone bright spot in the front office/coaching staff. Honestly I wanna see what kinda coach he’s going to hire once Rhule is inevitably let go soon. 

I think most of here thought the roster was good enough to be .500 and that is the reason for the anger.. If you thought the roster sucked from the get go.. Why the fug are you making threads in game 12 talking about who to blame when you didn't expect them to be good in the 1st place..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

If Colbert picks the players, how does Tomlin have final roster say in any way. And when did Tomlin receive this control? The owner made the call on Ben. Just as Tepper, or any owner would have to on a situation involving a franchise QB. Anymore crap that is not true you want to throw at the wall? 

He picks who plays right??  Do you think Colbert doesn't talk to Tomlin during the offseason and Tolmin has nothing to do until training camp??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Some one say receipts??

You knew what could go wrong but you still thought the roster was good enough to be a .500 team?? Who fault is that GM or Coaching??

Actually, sure looks like I nailed it on the "What I fear" thing. Or got closer than most. Hate that the other predictions weren't right. But I'm generally too optimistic. It's a failing of mine.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not. And I'm sure as hell not ready to trust an entire power structure built by the least intelligent football mind in the room.

Fitterer is a draft guy. Morgan is a pro player guy. I want to see what those guys can do with an offseason where they don't have a college coach in charge of setting the menu and making the final roster decisions.

Well said!

I don’t know why this is so hard for people to comprehend. Let the front office personnel do the job that theoretically they were hired to do. That starts with allowing them to pick their staff.

Everything about this organization is backwards. From hiring practices to emphasis on one player position over another. It’s honestly a joke.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dude wants "receipts" when I've been saying we're fuged this year from the moment we traded for Darnold. 😂

I got them but one would think that one of the “homers” that railed on you for being negative(and a mod) would step up and save the time. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Actually, sure looks like I nailed it on the "What I fear" thing. Or got closer than most. Hate that the other predictions weren't right. But I'm generally too optimistic. It's a failing of mine.

 

Come on be real.. You thought the roster was good enough to be a .500 team... So you thought the GM for the most part put a okay team together for Rhule to coach.. Rhule just ficked it up..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I hope you're right and we hang onto both of them and they build us into a powerhouse. Just right now I can't get past Fitterer thinking he and we had arrived after beating trash to get to 3-0. 

Morgan arrived too late in the offseason to have any significant impact on free agency, not that it might have mattered much with Mr. "I want versatility" in place.

Now I want to see what Fitterer and Morgan can do with the actual power to make the roster.

The main changes I want to see made are, obviously, coaching (preferably Nathaniel Hackett, maybe Brian Daboll if Morgan pushes for him), pruning any ody associated with Rhule from the team and procuring some additional front office types (Lake Dawson from Buffalo would be nice, Fitterer's old buddy Scot McCloughan if he can stay sober).

My one question is what to do with Pat Stewart. He's technically a Rhule guy but he does also have legit experience for his role.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Example.. Instead of going after a QB 2 years ago... Tomlin wants a Mlb.. Colbert trades up and gets him a Mlb..

Last year ..

Tomlin talks about having a strong run game and taking pressure off Big Ben.. They draft a 1st round RB...

Nothing saves a GM job more then drafting a New QB. And Pittsburgh had 2 chances to get one and they went with the HC (Tomlin) who still had faith in Ben and added more to his defensive philosophy.  

Pick another team.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

He picks who plays right??  Do you think Colbert doesn't talk to Tomlin during the offseason and Tolmin has nothing to do until training camp??

 

Of course he does. That’s not the issue. Although it’s easy to see why you want to get away from it. They can talk all day, every day. Colbert has final day on roster decisions. And so do over half the GMs in the NFL. Now it’s “he picks who plays”. That’s adorable deflection. 
 

    So in your world, coaches hand GMs a list and tell them exactly who to pick. And if they refuse, they are gone? Priceless!!!
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I got them but one would think that one of the “homers” that railed on you for being negative(and a mod) would step up and save the time. 

Give me and example where Colbert went against Tomlin for a player.. I gave you 2 where Tomlin had final say..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Come on be real.. You thought the roster was good enough to be a .500 team... So you thought the GM for the most part put a okay team together for Rhule to coach.. Rhule just ficked it up..

I  went back and looked at that thread and funny, but you didn't hazard a guess back then. 

And yes, after week 3 and a 3-0 record I thought the GM had been decent and we'd have a .500 team. Guess what, we aren't a .500 team and the GM isn't even decent. 

So you are blaming me for not warning you the team would be this bad? I'm having a hard time figuring out where you are coming from, man. Good luck to you. Times are hard, this thing is just a little blip in the world. May we all see better days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Example.. Instead of going after a QB 2 years ago... Tomlin wants a Mlb.. Colbert trades up and gets him a Mlb..

Last year ..

Tomlin talks about having a strong run game and taking pressure off Big Ben.. They draft a 1st round RB...

Where is this info coming from? Show your work. Let’s see this proof. And just because something is said by a coach or GM in public, doesn’t make it true. I would have thought Rhule disaster of a NFL career would have taught everyone at least that much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Of course he does. That’s not the issue. Although it’s easy to see why you want to get away from it. They can talk all day, every day. Colbert has final day on roster decisions. And so do over half the GMs in the NFL. Now it’s “he picks who plays”. That’s adorable deflection. 
 

    So in your world, coaches hand GMs a list and tell them exactly who to pick. And if they refuse, they are gone? Priceless!!!
 

Okay.. To end this..

Every coach has a Philosophy and scheme.. Example.. Pete in Seattle like long man cb.. So they draft long man CB..

Name me 1 GM'S philosophy and scheme ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...