Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

12/12 Game Thread: Canes vs Canucks, 10pm puck drop


lightsout
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, lightsout said:

He's pure potential. If he puts on size he could be a force because he likes to play physical. Not sure how he is on the puck but everything I've seen on him says he's more of a defensive guy

Purely a defensive-defenseman. In 142 games with Utica (AHL) he had a total of two goals. This year, in 17 games with Chicago he has 4 goals.

The knock on Chatfield from the Vancouver organization was his skating but Smith’s skating makes Chatfield’s look like McDavid’s.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Purely a defensive-defenseman. In 142 games with Utica (AHL) he had a total of two goals. This year, in 17 games with Chicago he has 4 goals.

The knock on Chatfield from the Vancouver organization was his skating but Smith’s skating makes Chatfield’s look like McDavid’s.

 

Honestly fine with him being purely defensive. Could be useful to have that extra ugly on pk and bottom lines.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Purely a defensive-defenseman. In 142 games with Utica (AHL) he had a total of two goals. This year, in 17 games with Chicago he has 4 goals.

The knock on Chatfield from the Vancouver organization was his skating but Smith’s skating makes Chatfield’s look like McDavid’s.

Yeah don’t need to see Smith flailing on a one on one again 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Care to elaborate why you disagree? We kicked the ball off 3 times and we kept the Browns to starting field position of the 22, 27, and 10 (would have been 21 before a penalty). All 3 of those are successes with the modern kickoff rule.
    • Its August so obviously quality options are not there. The question is whether any improvement can be made to the bottom of the depth chart.
    • NFL has a huge amount of parity.  The talent level between most NFL starters outside of the top 5 to 10 guys at a position is very comparable.  2020 worst teams Jacksonville Jaguars - 1-15 (worst record in NFL) New York Jets - 2-14 Cincinnati Bengals - 4-11-1 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 Houston Texans - 4-12 Carolina Panthers - 5-11 Detroit Lions - 5-11 Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11-1 Los Angeles Chargers - 7-9 Denver Broncos - 5-11 2024 Worst teams New York Giants - 3-14 (tied for worst) Cleveland Browns - 3-14 (tied for worst) Tennessee Titans - 3-14 (tied for worst) New England Patriots - 4-13 Carolina Panthers - 5-12 Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-13 Las Vegas Raiders - 4-13 New York Jets - 5-12 Chicago Bears - 5-12 Arizona Cardinals - 8-9 Bengals, Texans, Lions, Eagles, Broncos and the Jags have all made the the playoffs in the last 3 years. What I'm saying is it's stupid to argue when team is the worst when there is so much parity and the system allows quick turnarounds.    
×
×
  • Create New...