Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monday Night Playoffs


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

When Murray plays at an MVP level the Cardinals are good, however this is a perfect example of over reliance on one player. Cardinals are nothing without Murray, they expect him to create magic every time. 

That certainly sounds familiar to Panthers fans.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Fwiw, it sounds like most teams in the NFL.  If Aaron R, Tom Brady, Patrick Mahomes, etc... went down, their teams would struggle.  Teams that are not heavily dependent on the starting qb are exceedingly rare.  

I think you misunderstood the original.

Starting QB's going down obviously deep six any team, especially those with high quality QB's.  The point I was addressing it that Murray needed to play at an astronomically high level to give his team a chance.  Not just be healthy, but play so far out of his mind that it becomes comical.  Where the coaching hardly matters.

You know, like 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I think you misunderstood the original.

Starting QB's going down obviously deep six any team, especially those with high quality QB's.  The point I was addressing it that Murray needed to play at an astronomically high level to give his team a chance.  Not just be healthy, but play so far out of his mind that it becomes comical.  Where the coaching hardly matters.

You know, like 2015.

I don't think Murray has to play out of this world for the Cardinals to have a shot at winning most games.  Just like any QB in the NFL, if he completes passes and doesn't turn the ball over, the Cardinals have a shot to win.  But when he plays horribly like he did last night, they have no shot and I think that is true for most teams/qbs in the NFL. 

I have to admit though I am not enamored of Murray.  I think he can look exceptional, and he might get better, but he seems very inconsistent.   The Cardinals do need a better running game though to help him out.  

I also think the narrative that Cam carried us in 2015 is not exactly accurate.  He was great of course, and deserved the MVP. But our defense carried us for the first few games.  Josh Norman's interceptions where the reason we won several of the early games.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OriginalPD said:

If Cam played as poorly as Kyler did in that first half…of. With that said, it goes to show that a porous OL will make any QB look bad. Keep that in mind when evaluating the Panthers QB options going forward. 

Conversely, if either Cam or Sam had played for the Rams last night, they would look like world beaters. It has a lot to do with the coach and the oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...