Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on the Panthers quarterback options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Growl said:

You’re projecting your own distaste for Matt rhule onto what you think the team should be doing, not that it makes any sense because no organization would simply resign themselves to 5-8 win season without making corresponding moves to prepare for a rebuild.

how will you rationalize all this when players aren’t given away in a firesale? How will you rationalize when the panthers sign players in free agency? 

what you’re doing doesn’t exist. Dave tepper isn’t saying to himself, “we spent so much money Sam darnold, our cap, our precious cap, Rhule MUST swallow his medicine.”

it isn’t real. It’s a fantasy conjured by stupid fans who obsess over trivial things like the salary cap as if they personally paid money into it. 

I mean I greatly dislike Matt Rhule.  

But this concept has nothing to do with that.   My opinions aside, even a Panther writer under the organizational thumb like Gantt acknowledges Matt Rhule is being viewed as a hot seat coach.  He did so this week. 

I mean NFL history shows it is real.  It has shown the concept I explained happens all the time.   Will it happen here? Well, who knows....because well, David Tepper doesn't look like much of an owner. 

When you have a coach on the hot seat or is a lameduck...he doesn't get the same operational room and power(or at least shouldn't) as a coach that isn't.  That isn't a fan fantasy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

When you have a coach on the hot seat or is a lameduck...he doesn't get the same operational room and power(or at least shouldn't) as a coach that isn't. 

Agree completely.

Unfortunately, I've yet to see any solid indication that Matt Rhule's power and control is going to be reduced in any way before next season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Agree completely.

Unfortunately, I've yet to see any solid indication that Matt Rhule's power and control is going to be reduced in any way before next season.

yeah, it’s pending you actually have a good front office.  Our own is David Tepper. And as today, you can’t call him a good owner. 

so it is worrisome how Tepper will allow Rhule to operate while on a hot seat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I mean I greatly dislike Matt Rhule.  

But this concept has nothing to do with that.   My opinions aside, even a Panther writer under the organizational thumb like Gantt acknowledges Matt Rhule is being viewed as a hot seat coach.  He did so this week. 

I mean NFL history shows it is real.  It has shown the concept I explained happens all the time.   Will it happen here? Well, who knows....because well, David Tepper doesn't look like much of an owner. 

When you have a coach on the hot seat or is a lameduck...he doesn't get the same operational room and power(or at least shouldn't) as a coach that isn't.  That isn't a fan fantasy. 

Why don’t you name some of these instances of All The Time?

let’s break them down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

Why don’t you name some of these instances of All The Time?

let’s break them down.

You want me name all the head coaches in NFL history who have been on the hotseat or were entering lame duck seasons?  Who then had their hands tied in terms their ability to make hires? Sign players? Draft guys?   

no thanks.   We can go Carolina centric.  We can talk about the last time it happened here.  The year was 2010.   The coach was John Fox.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CRA said:

You want me name all the head coaches in NFL history who have been on the hotseat or were entering lame duck seasons?  Who then had their hands tied in terms their ability to make hires? Sign players? Draft guys?   

no thanks.   We can go Carolina centric.  We can talk about the last time it happened here.  The year was 2010.   The coach was John Fox.  

 

No, I want you to name all the teams with 1st or 2nd year (or even just under the general purview of new) head coaches who spent millions in free agency, made trades for high profile players, gave public votes or confidence to the direction from the GM and an obvious commitment from the owner who determined that they were going to continue riding things out as they were with no changes whatsoever in either direction-up or down-just to pointlessly sit through another year for no given reason other than to do it. 
 

the team will either build up or tear down. The notion, to take this thread back to its original premise, that they will intentionally force a coach to “swallow his medicine” because they’re mad about the “cap space” he used is silly.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Growl said:

No, I want you to name all the teams with 1st or 2nd year (or even just under the general purview of new) head coaches who spent millions in free agency, made trades for high profile players, gave public votes or confidence to the direction from the GM and an obvious commitment from the owner who determined that they were going to continue riding things out as they were with no changes whatsoever in either direction-up or down-just to pointlessly sit through another year for no given reason other than to do it. 
 

the team will either build up or tear down. The notion, to take this thread back to its original premise, that they will intentionally force a coach to “swallow his medicine” because they’re mad about the “cap space” he used is silly.

 

There is nothing to tear down.  We are one of the youngest teams in the NFL.  Rhule just immediately turned the car off road and has us stuck in the mud.   A new coach simply puts the car back on the journey Matt Rhule was supposed to lead. 

you are projecting arguments I am not making.   I’m saying hot seat HCs and lame duck HCs don’t get the same freedoms and ability as coaches who are where Matt Rhule once was.  At least in well run franchises.  And we are now entering that window with Rhule.  

so Rhule in theory this year should have his hands tied and restricted from bigger impacting plays that have high odds of impacting the next HC and putting him in a hole.   None of that is a new concept or some weird made up scenario for Rhule.  Doesn’t mean we won’t add players.  Sign guys and do some extensions.  It all has to be under the mindset Rhule could easily be unemployed in season next year though. 

No one is saying Rhule will be sabatoged.  Or the team is being tanked.  But Matt Rhule won’t have the same luxuries and freedoms he had early.  Lame duck and hot seat coaches don’t get to do whatever they want (in well run franchises).

Matt Rhule is in fact a hot seat HC.  Even the Panther employed writers acknowledge that.  The fact we only can land a bum OC the league cast off to a nothing jobs confirms where Rhule is at in the eyes of everyone.  As does guys turning down interviews for a “promotion” here.   Well run orgs simply start putting constraints on coaches like Rhule now finds himself being. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...