Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer on Tepper, Rhule and the Panthers quarterback options

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I mean I'd be pissed if we traded for Garoppolo but the dude is in large part a winner.  33-14 as a starting QB in the regular season and 4-2 in the postseason.

 Jared Goff was 42-27 in the regular season and 3-3 in the playoffs before last year. Does that make him a winner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

 Jared Goff was 42-27 in the regular season and 3-3 in the playoffs before last year. Does that make him a winner?

Umm...yes? Although still 10% lower of a win rate than Garoppolo.  You can debate the threshold for win percentage that would make someone a "winner", but >70% win rate for a starting QB with roughly 50 starts is objectively very strong.  You can criticize him for many things but "not winning" is not one of them.

What is your definition of "winner"?  Seems like yours has nothing to do with win percentage...so kinda directly contradicting the literal definition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Umm...yes? Although still 10% lower of a win rate than Garoppolo.  You can debate the threshold for win percentage that would make someone a "winner", but >70% win rate for a starting QB with roughly 50 starts is objectively very strong.  You can criticize him for many things but "not winning" is not one of them.

What is your definition of "winner"?  Seems like yours has nothing to do with win percentage...so kinda directly contradicting the literal definition. 

Winning percentage is not a QB stat as much as the talking heads love to quote it. It’s pretty easy to win playoff games if you only need to complete 6 passes and can just hand off and let your defense crush teams into oblivion. My take is that garroppolo (like goff) is nothing special, he’s just played on good teams that take him along for the ride. 


If it meant anything, then why would the Rams trade “winning” quarterback Jared Goff to get “losing” quarterback Matt Stafford?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Winning percentage is not a QB stat as much as the talking heads love to quote it. It’s pretty easy to win playoff games if you only need to complete 6 passes and can just hand off and let your defense crush teams into oblivion. My take is that garroppolo (like goff) is nothing special, he’s just played on good teams that take him along for the ride. 


If it meant anything, then why would the Rams trade “winning” quarterback Jared Goff to get “losing” quarterback Matt Stafford?

Dawg...you're arguing against a strawman.  The person I quoted said that Garoppolo couldn't even win with a stacked team and great coaching staff.  I said he was winning...that's it.  Everything else is an argument you're attributing to me that I've never made.  I never stated that he contributed in any meaningful way to his team winning.  Why would I say I'd hate trading for Garoppolo if I thought he was this beast of a QB carrying his team to a 70% win rate?  Your bolded take is also my take, which is why I don't want to trade for him and why I just said "you can criticize him for many things but 'not winning' is not one of them". 

All I did was correct that guy on an incorrect statement.  This is like if someone said "Ryan Santoso does not have a Super Bowl ring" and I corrected him and said "yes actually he does have a Super Bowl ring" and then you came in here and argued "Wow you really think Ryan Santoso is the reason his team won the Super Bowl?!?! From the practice squad?!".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

Dawg...you're arguing against a strawman.  The person I quoted said that Garoppolo couldn't even win with a stacked team and great coaching staff.  I said he was winning...that's it.  Everything else is an argument you're attributing to me that I've never made.  I never stated that he contributed in any meaningful way to his team winning.  Why would I say I'd hate trading for Garoppolo if I thought he was this beast of a QB carrying his team to a 70% win rate?  Your bolded take is also my take, which is why I don't want to trade for him and why I just said "you can criticize him for many things but 'not winning' is not one of them". 

All I did was correct that guy on an incorrect statement.  This is like if someone said "Ryan Santoso does not have a Super Bowl ring" and I corrected him and said "yes actually he does have a Super Bowl ring" and then you came in here and argued "Wow you really think Ryan Santoso is the reason his team won the Super Bowl?!?! From the practice squad?!".

I skipped over his post, and just read yours. My bad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By frankw · Posted

      Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • OldhamA
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • strato
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By strato · Posted

      I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...