Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Offensive Line - Is this an improvement?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Fans figured out early on he was the best looking LT we had on the roster. Coaches, not so much.

True. Doesn’t make him our best option moving forward but he should at least be thrown there for the time being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Yep, unfortunately I think you may be right. I have more hope for BC but DL and DCs weren’t doing a whole lot of scouting on how to beat BC. If he’s our starting LT, they will.

If we trade for Watson, Camper’s going to have to pull a rabbit out of his ass.

Or just cash these checks for one more season. 

Then it will be whatever happens after Rhule is gone. I suspect our post-Rhule coach will get selected by Deshaun Watson, if Tepper wants him as badly as the rumor mill says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, stbugs said:

Again, this isn’t true and I’m not trying to defend Rhule.

 

Sorry, Twitter paste wasn’t working at first. The guy beat in the image is Brown. He made a 280 pound DT made look like prime Von Miller. Brown could barely even keep a hand on him as he ran by.

Brown looked a lot like our Miller just against college competition, some of whom won’t ever start in the NFL.

One play does not define a player.  Even the best get burned now and then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...