Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Win win


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, stirs said:

Did not want Cam either.  Wanted Darius

QB's are a huge risk.  If I didn't want Cam, then you know I don't want these guys.

Too many future clip board holders in the group

Just in general, way WAY WAY WAYmore clip board holders in the other group. The one outside the top 10.

QB with a high pick is a big risk; like only 20% actually work out. After that? Those chances rapidly decrease to infinitesimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luciu5 said:

Just in general, way WAY WAY WAYmore clip board holders in the other group. The one outside the top 10.

QB with a high pick is a big risk; like only 20% actually work out. After that? Those chances rapidly decrease to infinitesimal.

Yeah, but this year, Ridder in the 2nd could turn out to be better than Willis, Pickett, Coral and the rest, nobody has confidence either way.  There is not Peyton Manning this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

WTF does this draft class have to do with your completely silly statement that you’d never want a QB in the top 10. The top 10 is the best place to get a SB winning QB. Guys like Brady, Montana and Wilson are the every 10 year exception. 1st round QBs are better and top 10 are best. There are busted QBs all over the draft. Who are the best QBs in the game now ignoring 85 year old Brady? Rodgers (1st round), Allen (top 10), Burrow (top 10), Mahomes (top 10), Herbert (top 10), Stafford (top 10), maybe Watson (1st round), Murray (top 10), Jackson (1st round) and Prescott (4th round). Then you have 5 more 1st round rookies from last year where 2-3 probably end up in the solid QB pile.

You would have had a heckuva team with Marcel Dareus instead of Cam.

If you want a stud QB, draft one top 10 or possibly 1st round. If you want to keep playing the lottery, try and build around a QB taken after the 1st.

I said "I" didn't want a QB in the top 10.  People do it a lot, some do well, others not so well.

You got confidence in the Panthers to pick a winner this year?  You put money on it?  Since we have nothing else as far as the draft, you gonna put your eggs all in on one of the guys in this draft class?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’ll take Willis, Pickett and Corral and give you 5 to 1 odds and you can have Ridder.

Internet talk and bravado is a fools game.

You have no clue which one of these guys will be worth a dime, if any.  With every pro day, there is a new number 1 QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...