Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next year


motocross_cat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hurry duuury we got a LT lets just pack it up and don't try to improve the qb position and suck cause.......next year!.

fug that, try to get a qb in the second or go get baker.  We have a good enough roster given they stay healthy to really win some ball games. 

Next year.  What a bunch of losers.

Yea I been drinking but I'm right.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GamecockSmitty4 said:

I don't think anybody disagrees with you and pretty certain the front office agrees and wants to grab a QB. But, nobody thinks one of these QBs available is worth risking next year's draft. 

Other teams think the same thing. All of these qbs will not go in the 2nd round.  None are really any better than the others so just take a deep breath and relax.  Either they get the one they want or they will take the best shot at who they have left.  That's how it works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

Hurry duuury we got a LT lets just pack it up and don't try to improve the qb position and suck cause.......next year!.

fug that, try to get a qb in the second or go get baker.  We have a good enough roster given they stay healthy to really win some ball games. 

Next year.  What a bunch of losers.

Yea I been drinking but I'm right.

Sam, Cam, PJ, Willis, Corral, Strong, Glass, Zappe, JG, and Baker ... ain't it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...