Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3/12/2022 Hurrucanes @ Bruins 7:00 PM EST


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’m still fuming over that goal. The first one fine, the ref preemptively blew the whistle, whatever. But Nino definitely hit pure net there on the second. He literally hit the top back side of the net and pure net right next to the pipe before it bounced out. Like are we just not counting goals anymore? 

I would think the league looked at it and there wasn’t enough evidence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

They didn’t, they couldn’t if the refs didn’t call it a goal. 

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

That doesn’t happen during the playoffs, especially when you want that game 7 money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

Which shot was it? I can't find a video of the actual shot. 

I’ll pull the clip in a bit. I posted the still last night. 
 

If you have the replay ability the second intermission is the best camera shots of it on the local broadcast, idk about national. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Maybe about raanta. That being said, I think most of the goals he has allowed has not been his fault. It's been either terrible defense or unlucky block deflections to the wrong side

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Snake said:

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

It's to their advantage though because teams that use speed and precise shots are just stuck in the mud. That allows them to beat the crap out of you for the entire game. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...