Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3/12/2022 Hurrucanes @ Bruins 7:00 PM EST


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’m still fuming over that goal. The first one fine, the ref preemptively blew the whistle, whatever. But Nino definitely hit pure net there on the second. He literally hit the top back side of the net and pure net right next to the pipe before it bounced out. Like are we just not counting goals anymore? 

I would think the league looked at it and there wasn’t enough evidence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

They didn’t, they couldn’t if the refs didn’t call it a goal. 

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

That doesn’t happen during the playoffs, especially when you want that game 7 money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

Which shot was it? I can't find a video of the actual shot. 

I’ll pull the clip in a bit. I posted the still last night. 
 

If you have the replay ability the second intermission is the best camera shots of it on the local broadcast, idk about national. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Maybe about raanta. That being said, I think most of the goals he has allowed has not been his fault. It's been either terrible defense or unlucky block deflections to the wrong side

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Snake said:

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

It's to their advantage though because teams that use speed and precise shots are just stuck in the mud. That allows them to beat the crap out of you for the entire game. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...