Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2 Canes vs Rangers Game 1 Weds., May 18, 7 ET (ESPN)


Recommended Posts

Just now, Snake said:

It's not insurmountable only because we are beating ourselves. I said this before the game without Anderson we have to play on point. We are definitely not. It looks like we are taking a break out there. 

Anderson has 0 goals scored this season. I don't expect him to be able to help us much in the way we need help.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

You made this exact comment after game three last series.

My statement still stands. I'm not saying he's terrible because he's definitely not but we start slow AF. It puts us in bad situations we don't need to be in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's not insurmountable only because we are beating ourselves. I said this before the game without Anderson we have to play on point. We are definitely not. It looks like we are taking a break out there. 

Because Anderson scored 100 goals for us this year???

There is a good argument that we might be down even more with him in net tonight

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Holy fug people! We’re down by one goal entering the third. Have we played our best? Absolutely not! Will we play our best in the third 100%! Watch this poo we’re coming in hard and fast

I mean....there isn't much of an option. The alternative is probably wasting another gem of a home game by Rannta. 

This is actually fuging embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Anderson has 0 goals scored this season. I don't expect him to be able to help us much in the way we need help.

With Anderson life is just easier. Not that he will solve everything but he is just the best goalie in the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You negative folks are about to see the complete opposite of what we’ve been playing in the third.  I’ve seen this type of game before. Last year we played Florida the exact same way for two periods. Come the third we scored four goals.  Already know what’s going to happen because I’ve seen it a bunch before.  Get your fuging popcorn ready because the boys are about to light it up like it’s Christmas time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Because Anderson scored 100 goals for us this year???

There is a good argument that we might be down even more with him in net tonight

Anderson is the best goalie in the league. No he doesn't score but he's better and gives up 2 a game. At this rate we are going to give up more than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

You negative folks are about to see the complete opposite of what we’ve been playing in the third.  I’ve seen this type of game before. Last year we played Florida the exact same way for two periods. Come the third we scored four goals.  Already know what’s going to happen because I’ve seen it a bunch before.  Get your fuging popcorn ready because the boys are about to light it up like it’s Christmas time. 

They just like being retards. It's one goal and we can regroup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They may be meaningless in the sense of wins and losses but this team isn't yet at a place where that is honestly all that matters  It's full of young players that need to make progress for us to compete consistently and this (multiple players in a year getting it) is evidence that's starting to happen.
    • This argument takes nuance, but I see both sides of it.  Bryce's good games, he's one of the best in the league, without a question. Lately, his really good games have been few and far between, though we are riding on a career best day last week. His bad games are not NFL quality. Hard to argue that as well.  He reminds me of Cam Newton in one way. They are both such statistical anomalies that evaluating them can be extremely difficult. QB roulette is absolutely no path to success. Furthermore, we have literally watched our franchise recently let 3 QBs go that left and proved they could still do it at a high level. I definitely give Bryce this season, and probably next season.  If Bryce can be the good version of Bryce more consistently it's crazy to let him walk. With the inconsistencies too, I think we could probably get a team friendly deal. If he can't bring next year's roster to the playoffs, he's not the guy, period.  I do think Bryce is always going to be a guy that requires a quality offensive line due to his physical limitations. I think we can do it, but it's a factor to consider.  You have to account for that money, and Damien Lewis, Robert Hunt and Taylor Moton are all between 28-31. If he's our guy for the next 10 years, it does appear he's going to have a top quality #1 receiver to get the ball to. 
×
×
  • Create New...