Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby or Robbie Anderson no show OTA’s


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

Moore also had 93 receptions compared to 53 for Robbie.

 

1 minute ago, slumdogmillionaire said:

Not even all about the drops.  His routes and everything sucked.   He had 53 catches on 110 targets and 519 yards…..while making 15 million.   His stats were the worse of his career.  

 

Oh damm. I never should have stated a stat that wasn't anti Robbie. Duck and Cover. Duck and Cover.

 

People call out his drops. I show he didn't even lead his own team. Huddle melts down. Yup, just another day.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Welp, this is going to be a fun thread. Full of negativity, snark, and out and out lies. As the Huddle tries to out Huddle each other. 

 

Let the games begin. I'll go. Robbies' hands are so bad. Even All State won't insure them. Bada bing.

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

5 minutes ago, mwa78 said:

Moore also had 93 receptions compared to 53 for Robbie.

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

 

lol Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. Quit making crap up.

 

And not one person thought that Oline was going to solve anything. Again. Quit making things up.

 

If you have to make crap up...

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol Robbie didn't lead the league in drops. Quite making crap up.

he led the league in dropped passes per reception that’s a fact, and that is exactly what I posted, how is this making things up?

you say no no no it was DJ who dropped more! 

but he only dropped one, single pass more with almost twice the receptions

seems to me you’re the one trying to make crap up lol

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, onmyown said:

yea and you were touting our oline as going to be one of the best we’ve ever had this time last year

we get it, facts don’t affect your optimism because it’s always better to have hope

but this isn’t some ailment diagnosis, it’s just sports, and we will call it for what it is

a fact you’d think most people look at when doing more than just looking at a ‘drop number’ - which puts Robby as the NFL leader and it’s not even close

with the receptions by the only other three above Anderson in the NFL he’d come out to about 13-14 drops, demolishing #1 which is 9

unless you of course are super optimist and say he would caught every single of those 50 more receptions, he’ll might have even scored 50 TDs

in which case he’s actually underpaid and the best wr in franchise history

 

 

Spin City. I like that show.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onmyown said:

he led the league in dropped passes per reception that’s a fact, and that is exactly what I posted, how is this making things up?

you say no no no it was DJ who dropped more! 

but he only dropped one, single pass more with almost twice the receptions

seems to me you’re the one trying to make crap up lol

 

No you didn't. You posted that Robbie lead the league in drops. Which is patently false. NOW you want to quantify yourself with this drop %. lol

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol 

It's silly to dunk on one receiver just to cover for the struggles of another. The common thread wears #14. Improve the most important position on the roster and most of this will be forgotten. Pretty basic stuff.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

No you didn't. You posted that Robbie lead the league in drops. Which is patently false. NOW you want to quantify yourself with this drop %. lol

Drop percent is what I was referring to. I also assumed that’s what people refer to when they call him the drop leader. That is the only way to quantify dropped passes.

But you insist a player who has 1000 receptions and 10 drops is somehow the leader over a player with 100 receptions and 7 drops. That is literally spinning things.

Who in the hell just looks at just the drop number without the receptions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

Drop percent is what I was referring to. I also assumed that’s what people refer to when they call him the drop leader. That is the only way to quantify dropped passes.

But you insist a player who has 1000 receptions and 10 drops is somehow the leader over a player with 100 receptions and 7 drops. That is literally spinning things.

Who in the hell just looks at just the drop number without the receptions?

 

Walk in back some more. There is a difference between Drops, and Drop %. If you get confused. Google is your friend.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

All I did was respond to Mr. @onmyown posting a stat that was factually wrong. And the Robbie hating crowd jumped in like they were offended. lol You gotta love this place.

it’s no biggie, we will just have to agree to disagree that receptions mean anything when discussion drops, i personally don’t understand looking at it like that - but it’s all good each their own

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...