Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OLED?


onmyown
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, they all look awesome at home. Yeah, that TV that's 5x the price might look better in the store side by side but guess what? That TV that's 5x the price won't be right beside my budget TV in my den. 😂

Meh…I wouldn’t say 5x…

The tiers are basically 1.5k, 1.0, 500.

Anything around 2-3k isn’t worth it, it’s just the above prices with extra features (nicer yes but not worth the jump at all and everyone knows it).

Then there re a few ridiculous priced TVs 5k-10k and beyond and these are basically showcases of the future 8k, mini led etc. but these technologies are years away from being affordable BUT close enough that OLED are finally coming down. I have been patiently waiting. A OLED today that cost say 3k, was 15k only 3-4 years ago.

And so it is time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree a lot with @onmyown here.  When I was shopping or my TV, I spent a long time getting reviews from as many different sources as I could.

I read up a lot on Rtings before it became premium.  Lots of Whipserstatus74 on youtube as well as Stop the FOMO.  I like how they are true tv nuts and can cut through the marketing speak to give you solid opinions.

In the age of plasma versus LCD, I helped a lot of people buy TVs (not as a store employee, but as someone just waiting for my wife at Yankee Candle).  I've always been a TV nerd.  In the days of 4k and different imaging engines, things have changed a LOT in the ensuing years.

You have to look at your budget and room space.  Some folks have the room for an 86" TV, so great!  There's where they should look.  My room/TV location had enough room for a 65" TV.  So then I looked at what was the best TV for less than 1500.  After looking at a ton of reviews, I wanted a LG C1 to replace my aging 50" Panasonic Plasma.  But my wife like to keep all of the windows open during the daytime.  We also have a tendency to leave the TV paused for extended periods of time (marriage problems lol).

I love the look of an OLED but we didn't have the budget (they were still like 1800 at the time we bought) and our room situation wasn't great.  So then we started looking at the LCDs.  A couple of years ago, we bought a Samsung 43" TU7000 for the bedroom.  It's been OK, not great for HDR, but find for watching Discovery+ is fine.  While the TV performance was fine, the OS was annoying.  We didn't like it.  But we have gotten tired of the ROKU death cycle - where a Roku seems to die out of the blue only to work again in a week.  So the smart TV system was important.

That brough us to TCL, Hisense, and Sony.  The internet smart guys said that the TCL and Hisense (whatever their top tier, FALD backlit tv was) were the best value.  But color and motion are important to me.  The Sony X90J meet my budget and the all important color and motion requirements I needed.

Man, that was a lot of typing.  So the TL/DR - figure out your budget, what features mean the most to you, look around at a variety of reviewers, and buy what you feel is best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, d-dave said:

I agree a lot with @onmyown here.  When I was shopping or my TV, I spent a long time getting reviews from as many different sources as I could.

I read up a lot on Rtings before it became premium.  Lots of Whipserstatus74 on youtube as well as Stop the FOMO.  I like how they are true tv nuts and can cut through the marketing speak to give you solid opinions.

In the age of plasma versus LCD, I helped a lot of people buy TVs (not as a store employee, but as someone just waiting for my wife at Yankee Candle).  I've always been a TV nerd.  In the days of 4k and different imaging engines, things have changed a LOT in the ensuing years.

You have to look at your budget and room space.  Some folks have the room for an 86" TV, so great!  There's where they should look.  My room/TV location had enough room for a 65" TV.  So then I looked at what was the best TV for less than 1500.  After looking at a ton of reviews, I wanted a LG C1 to replace my aging 50" Panasonic Plasma.  But my wife like to keep all of the windows open during the daytime.  We also have a tendency to leave the TV paused for extended periods of time (marriage problems lol).

I love the look of an OLED but we didn't have the budget (they were still like 1800 at the time we bought) and our room situation wasn't great.  So then we started looking at the LCDs.  A couple of years ago, we bought a Samsung 43" TU7000 for the bedroom.  It's been OK, not great for HDR, but find for watching Discovery+ is fine.  While the TV performance was fine, the OS was annoying.  We didn't like it.  But we have gotten tired of the ROKU death cycle - where a Roku seems to die out of the blue only to work again in a week.  So the smart TV system was important.

That brough us to TCL, Hisense, and Sony.  The internet smart guys said that the TCL and Hisense (whatever their top tier, FALD backlit tv was) were the best value.  But color and motion are important to me.  The Sony X90J meet my budget and the all important color and motion requirements I needed.

Man, that was a lot of typing.  So the TL/DR - figure out your budget, what features mean the most to you, look around at a variety of reviewers, and buy what you feel is best.

Yep. Value is a BIG factor.

I had a $1k Samsung I bought and few years ago. Recently I bought a 55 inch TCL for $500.

I spent all my media time on the TCL. TCL is a fantastic value brand imo. I was surprised how much better it was than my fancy Samsung.  Any spare room or bedroom gets the TCL 100% and the main room will get the C1 or 80j when I finally decide.

I do like the best extra features of the 90j but as it stands the 65 90j is 3k and the 80j is 1.5k. 

I just can’t justify the difference and to be honest that has been kind of annoying. I’m comparison the gap in the LG G1 and C1 is only $500 and that to me makes more sense. Of course this year they have the C2/G2 but the way prices plummet just months after a new model is released I feel it’s always smarter value wise to get last years’ model.

But yea, value to me is more important than price. It’s down to the C1 or 80j for me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, onmyown said:

Yep. Value is a BIG factor.

I had a $1k Samsung I bought and few years ago. Recently I bought a 55 inch TCL for $500.

I spent all my media time on the TCL. TCL is a fantastic value brand imo. I was surprised how much better it was than my fancy Samsung.  Any spare room or bedroom gets the TCL 100% and the main room will get the C1 or 80j when I finally decide.

I do like the best extra features of the 90j but as it stands the 65 90j is 3k and the 80j is 1.5k. 

I just can’t justify the difference and to be honest that has been kind of annoying. I’m comparison the gap in the LG G1 and C1 is only $500 and that to me makes more sense. Of course this year they have the C2/G2 but the way prices plummet just months after a new model is released I feel it’s always smarter value wise to get last years’ model.

But yea, value to me is more important than price. It’s down to the C1 or 80j for me.

Yesh, I haven't been disappointed with TCL TVs.  Had one in the playroom, and my inlaws bought a 625 a few years ago. The only thing that got me was the motion/color performance.  That's just a me thing though.

I was considering the 648 (the Google TV with mini-LED back lighting), but I didn't want to spend a $1200+ on what is still an unknown commodity for me.  I don't blame anyone for making their choices.  Just be happy 😃  That's the biggest thing when buying a TV, just be happy with your purchase and don't stress afterwards with FOMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2022 at 6:16 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, they all look awesome at home. Yeah, that TV that's 5x the price might look better in the store side by side but guess what? That TV that's 5x the price won't be right beside my budget TV in my den. 😂

No disrespect against anyone wanting the latest and greatest but I can’t justify the expense. I end up buying the old model that turns out to be a huge upgrade over what I currently own. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is time to take a look at the defense.  Without further ado do.... Edge (OLB):  I think we overpaid for Jaelan Phillips, but he is constant pressure with 73 pressures in 2025, ranking 9th in the NFL.  In all, he was the 20th (of 111) rated pass rushing edge in 2025 according to PFF, putting him in the top 20% in the nfl.  With a pair of solid ILBs beside him and if we can get Wharton going, I think the sum of the parts will make him better than he was in Philly.  Furthermore, with second-year pro Princely Umanmielen behind him, I expect him to grow with the tutoring and competition. On the other side, the duo of Nick Scourton and Patrick Jones II is strong, in my view.  Scourton generated 34 total pressures as a pass rusher. That total included 8 sacks, 23 hurries, 3 hits. Against the run, he recorded 28 solo tackles. For a rookie, second round, edge, that is great.  He also forced 1 fumble on the season. Jones was decent in 2025 in just 131 snaps, but he is solid veteran depth.   We seem to lack the elite pass rusher, but this rotational unit will be a big upgrade over last season.  Expect Scourton and Princely to show improvement. While it is unlikely that we add more to edge this draft, you can never have too many pass rushers (well, you can--two sophomores and two veterans is a good mix). Would the Panthers take an edge if one was sitting there? Absolutely. Defensive End:  Derrick Brown is a stud.  I did not notice how dominant he became as a pass rusher.  His PFF pass-rush grade of 72.0 ranked 23rd among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His run-defense grade of 66.3 ranked 22nd at the position. He generated 35 total pressures as a pass rusher. That total included 6 sacks, 23 hurries, 6 hits. On the other side:  What the hell?  Tershawn Wharton earned a 40.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 127th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His PFF pass-rush grade of 57.0 ranked 95th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemen. His run-defense grade of 34.8 ranked 125th at the position. However, Wharton needs to be situational and we really need a few DEs who can plug and pressure.  LaBryan Ray is an interior defensive lineman for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 45.7 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season.  You cannot tell me that we are not going to add a DE.  In my view, this is a HUGE need that we have not adequately addressed.  There were only 3 DEs in the NFL who played more snaps that Derrick Brown.  We have to give him more blows during the game.  So After Brown, we have 2 other players who need to improve a lot to reach mediocre. Nose Tackle:  Of course, a NT might move out some to help stuff the run at DE opposite Brown, and stats do not always reflect on a NT's actual value.  Bobby Brown III earned a 54.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 80th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemen.  His PFF pass-rush grade of 51.1 ranked 126th among 134 qualified interior defensive linemans. His run-defense grade of 57.8 ranked 51st at the position.   Behind him, Cam'Ron Jackson is an  earned a 45.5 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season.   The defensive line is weak, based on 2025 performance rankings in PFF.  After DBrown, they pretty much suck.  These are the guys our ILBs will be counting on. Inside Linebacker:  Devin Lloyd earned a 89.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 3rd among 88 qualified linebackers. His PFF coverage grade of 81.1 ranked 3rd among 88 qualified linebackers. His run-defense grade of 83.2 ranked 11th at the position. His pass-rush grade of 82.2 ranked 5th among qualified linebackers.  He's good.  At the moment, beside him is Trevin Wallace  who earned a 55.9 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 57th among 88 qualified linebackers. His PFF coverage grade of 64.5 ranked 25th among 88 qualified linebackers. His run-defense grade of 42.3 ranked 85th at the position. His pass-rush grade of 64.2 ranked 45th among qualified linebackers.  Wallace was best as a coverage LB, and based on my memory, I am not sure he was in the top third, but if PFF says so...however, he was nearly last vs. the run.  We need better to play beside Lloyd.  Bam Morris-Scott earned a 37.6 overall PFF defensive grade. To put that in perspective, I was rated by PFF at 32.3 on my couch.   Cherilus Claudin is the third best ILB on the roster right now. He earned a 59.2 overall PFF defensive grade in just over 200 snaps.  Having lost Rozeboom, the Panthers are very thin behind Lloyd.  Look for a starting-caliber ILB in the draft.  Wallace is not the guy, but he is decent depth. Nickel CB:  Chau Smith-Wade  earned a 57.0 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 79th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His PFF coverage grade of 57.2 ranked 79th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 55.4 ranked 77th at the position.  For a nickel, he played a lot--garnering over 600 snaps.  Corey Thornton was a pleasant surprise, until he was injured.  However, in just 127 snaps, he was very good, earning a 68.5 overall PFF defensive grade.  I think he can play outside in a pinch, but nickel might be his gig.  I am not sold that Nickel is in good hands, but Thornton is promising.  Smith-Wade is average, and with the experience he has accumulated, we are probably not prioritizing Nickel, but there are some good nickels in the draft. Cornerback:  Michael Jackson should have been in the pro bowl.  He earned a 79.1 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 4th among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His PFF coverage grade of 80.9 ranked 3rd among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 67.2 ranked 36th at the position. He recorded 4 interceptions on the season. Jackson broke up 9 passes in coverage. He allowed a 72.9 passer rating when targeted by opposing quarterbacks --SOLID!!  Our second-best CB, Jaycee Horn, was in the pro bowl.  He earned a 57.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 76th among 114 qualified corner.backs. His PFF coverage grade of 61.6 ranked 61st among 114 qualified cornerbacks. His run-defense grade of 50.5 ranked 87th at the position.  He recorded 5 interceptions on the season.  Our CBs had NINE interceptions in 2025.  It is doubtful they duplicate that figure, but Jackson was our best CB.   We are thin at CB, but the two we put out there are solid.  Nickel, at this time, is "meh," but both are developing and should improve.  A great draft for Nickel.  The Panthers will add a CB somehow. Safety:  For now, Trevon Moehrig is as advertised--above average vs. the run, below average in coverage, making him average. He earned a 64.3 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 50th among 98 qualified safeties. His PFF coverage grade of 55.3 ranked 64th among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 73.5 ranked 37th at the position.  Lathan Ransom got some valuable experience in 2025, getting in on 330 plays or so.  He earned a 62.9 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 56th among 98 qualified safeties.  (Average, not bad for a day 3 rookie) His PFF coverage grade of 55.8 ranked 63rd among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 85.1 ranked 4th at the position.  A pure strong safety, if you ask me.  Nick Scott  earned a 67.8 overall PFF defensive grade in the 2025 season, 36th among 98 qualified safeties. His PFF coverage grade of 67.3 ranked 31st among 98 qualified safeties. His run-defense grade of 69.3 ranked 56th at the position.  Expect a draft pick at FS.  Demani Richardson is a safety for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 71.5 overall PFF defensive grade n 29 plays.  Nothing to see here.  Isaiah Simmons is probably more special teams than defensive player.   Overall:  We are thin on defense.  No real depth at CB, S, and DE/NT.  However, we have 5 starters who are pro bowl level players (D. Brown, Lloyd, Jackson, Horn, and Phillips--and I might throw Scourton in on that pile for the sixth potential pro bowler).  We are weak at NT, and if Wharton does not step up, DE.  Funny, I see Edge as our strength (and we really don't have a sack artist) and I love our starting CBs.  Moehrig is making too much to be average.   Expect:  In the draft, I think we have to draft a DT.  Having done this, I am not sure that we go after a S when we have such glaring needs at other positions.  We could upgrade at nickel and give the CB room more depth.  OLB?  Wallace is decent depth, and he could start in a pinch.   DE is our biggest need.  The answer could be on the roster?            
×
×
  • Create New...