Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke at practice today.


Recommended Posts

On 6/9/2022 at 10:22 AM, SizzleBuzz said:

Yeah in light of clear organizational dysfunction apparent to all, and a steady revolving door of sudden/unexplained departures across the organization...

...Luke's the one-and-only "nothing to see here" situation, yeah right 🤦‍♂️.

No, you're right.  We hate Rhule and every move that has been made at all since we collectively decided this is entirely his fault.  That's how we want it to be and since we really have no idea that's how I'm sure it is...   yea right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

No, you're right.  We hate Rhule and every move that has been made at all since we collectively decided this is entirely his fault.  That's how we want it to be and since we really have no idea that's how I'm sure it is...   yea right.

We hate Rhule? I find him hilarious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

No, you're right.  We hate Rhule and every move that has been made at all since we collectively decided this is entirely his fault.  That's how we want it to be and since we really have no idea that's how I'm sure it is...   yea right.

Exactly 33.33% of the of the 75 respondents in this poll confirmed their hate for Matt Rhule... 

...the poll is probably representative of the broader huddle population and anecdotally the daily torrent of vitriol hurled Rhule's way certainly underscores the supposition 🤙.

041A804F-B23B-4A6F-BAA7-ED54346D8075.jpeg

EC3A222B-2330-4E22-8022-5D10D35B4EC5.jpeg

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...