Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Summer League Roster


Daddy_Uncle
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/8/2022 at 7:09 PM, Carl Spackler said:

Must be really tired of yourself, then

You probably wanted Williams over Duren lol .... And y'all wanna talk about me being a bias UNC fan. Only a ignorant Duke fan (not a smart one like plenty of my friends) believe Williams should be in the same sentence as Duren. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news is its sounding like GG Jackson may reclass up and be eligible for 2023. 3 fantastic prospects for the Hornets in the top 3 next year in Vic, Scoot and GG. Sucks for my heels, but we don't have any more available scholarships for the upcoming year. I hope GG makes the best decision for himself!

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jared Patterson said:

Good news is its sounding like GG Jackson may reclass up and be eligible for 2023. 3 fantastic prospects for the Hornets in the top 3 next year in Vic, Scoot and GG. Sucks for my heels, but we don't have any more available scholarships for the upcoming year. I hope GG makes the best decision for himself!

Took 3 months for Lamont Paris to steal UNC's second highest rated commit of all time from Hubert Fraud Davis. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s time to get an actual coach for the G-League and Summer League teams of the future.

Surenkamp is just a shitty coach who has no experience other than being the director of ops for a horrible South Alabama basketball team.

These college players are coming in and getting worse coaching from their G-League coach than they got in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus Mitch you couldn't sign 1 PG who can run a offense..

You draft big men and we can't see them offensively because no guard can run the offense, bring the ball up with out shitting in their pants or get into the paint.. No perimeter defenders at all.. Scottie son is living in the paint..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...