Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Abby Labar


 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Guy has a point, though. Although both Cole and Abby made their choices as adults, the reality is this:

She lost her job and blew up her career while Cole gets a new, bigger contract, moves his family and the only possible consequences he faces are from his family and friends, and those certainly are not a given.

Athletes arent going to lose their job over affairs. That would be silly. Doesnt stop them from ridicule however. 

Like it has been said before, Abby probably would still have a job too if
A. She wasnt a reporter in the public eye
B. Didnt use her access to her personal advantage
C. Biggest reason above all, her actions affected the team

Any other job, she probably wouldve been OK too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Athletes arent going to lose their job over affairs. That would be silly. Doesnt stop them from ridicule however. 

I didn't suggest that- I simply pointed out the facts.

And, when is the last time you saw or heard of any guy get "ridiculed" over banging a very attractive woman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Also all white knights need to stop and think about what if the roles were reverse and a male did what Abby has done.

So, 2 things here... if the roles were reversed and it was as consensual as this situation was, then Cole might have been fired if he was the reporter.

Second, why is it only "what Abby has done" and not Cole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anybodyhome said:

I didn't suggest that- I simply pointed out the facts.

And, when is the last time you saw or heard of any guy get "ridiculed" over banging a very attractive woman?

There have been many examples of men in power getting in trouble because of their pecker. It goes both ways. Unless you have statistics that a woman is more shamed than a man, its just hearsay. Both can be viewed negatively by the public and judged if they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anybodyhome said:

So, 2 things here... if the roles were reversed and it was as consensual as this situation was, then Cole might have been fired if he was the reporter.

Second, why is it only "what Abby has done" and not Cole?

Because Im talking about Abby, wasnt that obvious?

And absolutely Cole would be fired. Using his access to bang married women and affecting that team overall. No way he would have a job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Unless you have statistics that a woman is more shamed than a man, its just hearsay.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153231/

I was going to start listing references, but this one from the NIH is probably more scientific in its approach. 

Ian Cole is collecting fist-bumps and high-fives, while hearing, "You hit that!?!" and Abby Labar is now collecting an unemployment check. 

Again, they both made adult decisions and the consequences of those decisions may take years to put in the rear view mirror, but each will have to face their respective accountability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anybodyhome said:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7153231/

I was going to start listing references, but this one from the NIH is probably more scientific in its approach. 

Ian Cole is collecting fist-bumps and high-fives, while hearing, "You hit that!?!" and Abby Labar is now collecting an unemployment check. 

Again, they both made adult decisions and the consequences of those decisions may take years to put in the rear view mirror, but each will have to face their respective accountability.

Im pretty sure she would still have a job at Bally if she didnt bang anyone on the team. If it was someone else, she most likely wouldve been fine. Same with Cole.

Cole did lose his chance with us. No way we bring him back after all this. If it was someone else Cole did it with, we probably would be looking to bring him back.

Just because he can go to another team while Abby lost her job here doesnt mean Abby will never have another chance. She can still most likely go somewhere else eventually and become a reporter again. However, as it has been mentioned before a reporters integrity is highly regarded and she will have to work to rebuild that. Athletes dont have that, but if you want to view them negatively, go ahead.

I dont think anyone can play this sad song for Abby or  "see from her perspective" when many men in power have lost their jobs because they used that power for sexual advantages. You want to talk about double standards, dont change your stance because a woman does the samething. That a general "you" and goes for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Argument: Abby Labar loses her job after abusing her power while Cole isnt retained, but goes to another team.

YES!! THATS WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN!!

You are supposed to get rid of those that abuse their power!

STFU

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Guy has a point, though. Although both Cole and Abby made their choices as adults, the reality is this:

She lost her job and blew up her career while Cole gets a new, bigger contract, moves his family and the only possible consequences he faces are from his family and friends, and those certainly are not a given.

His contract was up.  What could the team do? So was Abby's.  The team didn't resign either.  Maybe you should get mad at Tampa for giving Cole a contract.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Access inside a professional North American team that not a lot of other people in America have.

... and?

Unless there are some unspoken allegations that she leveraged privileged team information to blackmail Cole into her bed, then I'm not sure what you are so up in arms about.

No matter how much you try to #MeToo her, that's not what this situation is.

To be clear, nothing public so far paints Abby as a victim in this affair either. On the surface, this sounds like the manager found the fry cook and the hostess in the walk-in cooler and had to let both of them go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...