Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR


Floppin
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

He's not a 3rd string QB. He's your 3rd rd QB put 4th on the depth chart behind Sam turnover machine Darnold and PJ camp fodder Walker. Sam is gone after this year. PJ should have been gone before training camp. Corral needed to be taking the number 2 reps instead of Darnold and damn sure ahead of PJ. 

We all knew when we traded for Baker, SD was out as starter. That makes him a backup and a pretty bad one at that. This whole QB competition charade is freaking pointless.

PJ is here because of Rhule, plain and simple. He was signed the day after our season ended why? We're we so afraid we couldn't replace PJ that we had to sign him before another team could snatch him up? Everyone knew we were going to try and draft a QB. It was about a well kept secret as Hurney picking Will Grier a month before it happened. 

Either you wanted Corral to develop or not. He's the only QB on our roster under contract after this season. You gotta do something with him or you're going into season 4 of Rhay-Z with ZERO qbs with a single snap of NFL experience beyond "mental reps."

It's so stupid it's laughable and if it was any other team other than the Panthers, we'd all be making fun of them for having this clown show. 

This is all your opinion based on nothing..

Have you not been listening to them??

For WEEKS they've been saying "their plan was Hopefully never playing him this season"..

How the fug do you make him the 2nd QB on the depth chart when you don't want him to play this season??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Depends on whether they are designated to return.  And that was what I was referring to.

Matt Corral suffers "significant" injury (panthers.com)

But I looked up lisfranc, and it might be season ending.  I was thinking of the attempt to bring Cam back from it, when they didn't put him on season ending IR for a while.  

Yeah he'll go on season ending IR. Even if they thought he'd be able to make it back for the last couple of games there's literally no point at all to do so. Cam was our starter, Corral was never going to start regardless baring a meteor strike taking out the rest of the QB room.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

What Oline was a 3rd string players supposed to be behind??

They want the team to play all the starters so Corral can get reps with them and never actually play a game this season as the would have been third string QB.   On a positive note we only have to carry two qbs on the active roster this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

This is all your opinion based on nothing..

Have you not been listening to them??

For WEEKS they've been saying "their plan was Hopefully never playing him this season"..

How the fug do you make him the 2nd QB on the depth chart when you don't want him to play this season??

When has that plan ever worked in the nfl?   If it was a viable plan wouldn’t you see more teams doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Malik Willis is a project that needs to sit and develop……….oh wait

Oh wait what?? They are not planning on him being the starter unless you can post a story saying they are??

Don't worry I'll wait. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lurk21 said:

Your  possible future qb should of got  more 2nd string players. Pj has 4 years in the league... The qb position  is the one we have messed up over n over under Rhules watch.  Give the guy a fair shot. We all know he wasn't ready this year but no need in him getting thrown to the wolves. 

So he should have only played in the 2nd qrt right??

So him not getting enough reps wouldn't be a problem then??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corral should have been getting snaps ahead of PJ but he was never going to get QB 2 reps so long as both Baker and Sam were on the team. To say otherwise is living in fantasy land and that's even without the QB comp. Had Baker been named QB1 out the gate Sam was still QB two while he remained on the team. Corral was always going to unfortunately play with scrubs at times in preseason. Injuries just fuging happen sometimes, my god.

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...