Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR


Floppin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

He didn’t look good and then got hurt like he did throughout college. He needs to get healthy and add some weight to his frame to compete next year. You are obsessing over him like you were with Strong.

No even with all that he's worth more and plays better than all of them. Facts.

Fake competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

The other guys are proven to be unable to cut it ultimately. You expect different?

With Corral you at least had a chance. That's gone.

And Corral has proven he wasn't ready by most beat reporters who watch practice every day.. 

I know you were covering your ears.. But Newton, Person and Council have been saying for weeks that Corral was looking lost and having problems getting the offense.. Even Matt himself blamed going to Ole Miss as a reason for transition problems..

Did you not see any of this??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Sam,Baker,PJ you'd be hard pressed to get someone to trade for any of them. Facts.

Corral would take just a couple phone calls, you'd probably get phone calls.

That's it in a nutshell dum dums.

Making up poo again. What do you think we could trade an injured late 3rd round QB who has looked like the worst of his class so far for? The only advantage he has has a cheap contract. He is a project QB so calm down and let’s see what he has in the long run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

And Corral has proven he wasn't ready by most beat reporters who watch practice every day.. 

I know you were covering your ears.. But Newton, Person and Council have been saying for weeks that Corral was looking lost and having problems getting the offense.. Even Matt himself blamed going to Ole Miss as a reason for transition problems..

Did you not see any of this??

So NOT playing helps. Less reps. Riding the pine, the Aaron Rodgers method.

A. We ain't winning nothing, not with that guy in charge.

B. We aren't the Packers and Baker Mayfield isn't Brett Favre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippadonn said:

So NOT playing helps. Less reps. Riding the pine, the Aaron Rodgers method.

A. We ain't winning nothing, not with that guy in charge.

B. We aren't the Packers and Baker Mayfield isn't Brett Favre.

C. And Matt Corral isn't Aaron Rodgers..

D. If Corral did play.. We would be drafting his replacement next year.. New coach new QB..

He did play and got hurt..

Read this again..

YOU WANTED HIM TO GET PLAYING TIME!!

He got hurt doing what you wanted.. smh

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

IMO the timing suggests otherwise. Seems like we wanted to assess where Corral was in his development to see if he could legit compete for the job and when it was clear he was nowhere near ready then we shifted gears to go get Mayfield.

Eh, we were targeting mayfield even before the draft back in March. I think the timing and behind able to walk away for a bit got the browns to cave on the salary aspect which was clearly a hang up from our side. 
 

although we could both be right to a certain degree I think getting Baker here was a goal before we even had Corral.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refusing to draft and develop a QB will be Matt Rhules downfall. He had his chance. He ignored him. You need full speed reps WITH guys you have chemistry with hopefully guys that can make an NFL roster. Matt Rhule was throwing to future car salesman. Just saying. A lot of drops. Put those drops on his stat sheet you'd be singing a different tune.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Refusing to draft and develop a QB will be Matt Rhules downfall. He had his chance. He ignored him. You need full speed reps WITH guys you have chemistry with hopefully guys that can make an NFL roster. Matt Rhule was throwing to future car salesman. Just saying. A lot of drops. Put those drops on his stat sheet you'd be singing a different tune.

Yeah.  

But Reality is he made that Mistake a year ago...

With Fields not Corral..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Unless Baker balls this year and we re-sign him, we are back in the QB market next draft.  There's no way we can depend on Corral now that he's shelved for a large portion of the season to be QB1 beyond this year.  

That seem to be the plan all along..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Unless Baker balls this year and we re-sign him, we are back in the QB market next draft.  There's no way we can depend on Corral now that he's shelved for a large portion of the season to be QB1 beyond this year.  

That's what really messed up for him. No wonder Cam didn't want anything to do with this "situation". Wise. 

Totally wasted pick. Wasn't valued. Gave his best, which most of us know is better than these guys, wasn't allowed to compete.

We all knew Corral had absolutely no chance starting for Matt Rhule. We all knew before the season used car salesman preferred a car with more miles, character, squeeks, smoke... sometimes, just run it!

That's why Operation Golden Corral was satire. Our HC ISN'T Bill Belichick. We all knew that, opposite.

I agree. We'll be looking for a top pick. It's a Matt Rhule promise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That seem to be the plan all along..

Deep QB draft this year.  People will get all caught up focusing on Stroud and Young.  We won't be bad enough to get either of them and I'm fine with that.  The next tier beyond those two is considerably deep.  It's hard to say exactly at this point because the season hasn't started yet, but it could be as many as 4-5 guys with a mid-late first round grade.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...