Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snap Counts: Carolina at New England preseason Week 2


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Yes.  Very encouraging.  Not exactly Luke and TD but Shaq and Smith should help a weak LB core. 

Littleton and Luvu are solid as well. interior D-line is the main glaring weakness at this point. They'll have to grab a DT off waivers next week

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Those words didn't come from my mouth.  I know sometimes we disagree with these numbers.  I thought you might have a different take on Mays.

MY BAD. 

He was solid at guard and then I guess his numbers took a hit when he moved to Center with the 4th stringers? Either way I think having Elf/Boze/Cade/Teck as flexible interior guys should be pretty solid. Boze and Cade can easily fill in at either guard position if not getting starting Center time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He was solid at guard and then I guess his numbers took a hit when he moved to Center with the 4th stringers? Either way I think having Elf/Boze/Cade/Teck as flexible interior guys should be pretty solid. Boze and Cade can easily fill in at either guard position if not getting starting Center time

That is probably spot on.  Forgot he was the only player that will make the team on the field at that time. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...