Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Refs screwed us


gorillamilitia13
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

If Matt Rhule would quit sniffing his ass then that wouldn’t have even mattered.

And let’s be real… York’s kick was good from 70, backing them up 10 yards wasn’t going to make a difference other than the fact that the Browns would have set another record on us.

10 second run off buddy

edit: and whose to say he would've made the exact same kick from 68 yards if he was able to get the kick off in time.

Edited by gorillamilitia13
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

If Matt Rhule would quit sniffing his ass then that wouldn’t have even mattered.

And let’s be real… York’s kick was good from 70, backing them up 10 yards wasn’t going to make a difference other than the fact that the Browns would have set another record on us.

10 second run off and no stoppage of the clock. The browns would have had 3 seconds to line up for a kick.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gorillamilitia13 said:

No stoppage of the clock, the Browns would have had 3 seconds to send their kicking team out, get a kick off, and make a 68 yarder. That's not happening 

Literally already replied to this, a flag was on the play so the clock would have stopped until the ball was set. Browns would have already had the kicking team out there cause it was fourth down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

Just got back from the game.  We had the lead, then refs got involved and it was over.  Without the roughing the passer call and those 15 yards we would have won.    I came home and rewatched it and even the announcers said it was a BS call.  We had the lead.  The zebras corrected that. 

I see the haters are celebrating.  No surprises there.  They running around defending the zebras.

Those arguing for the zebras in this game against the panthers are showing their stripes.

Bad calls happen all the time… good teams control what they can control… the Panthers on the other hand, left it to chance.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...