Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College GameDay coming to Boone


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

That doesn't surprise me. The house of mouse is one of the more greedy entertainment companies.

It's the same bundle, it's just poor programming/coordination. When they first created the bundle it was the most ridiculous billing situation you could imagine. I was getting like 4 separate debits for the most random amounts. Hulu was like $0.14 for instance. I ended up talking to customer service trying to figure out how to upgrade to get no commercials on hulu and I ended up having to cancel all of the bundle and redo it through Hulu to not only get no commercials but to finally make it just one charge.

Edited by Floppin
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I shamelessly illegally stream a poo ton of sporting events. I certainly feel zero guilt streaming college sports since the athletes get $0 from those TV contracts.

Yeah, the good part is because of espn+, there's a lot more games that you can stream than you used to be able to. Before it existed, most teams just didn't have games televised at all except like 2-3 a year if that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

95%? There’s a handful of games I can’t watch live  on YouTube tv at the moment. 

Unless you're illegally streaming, ESPN+ is the only carrier for tons of games a week. There's more games that just FBS P5 you know? Probably half of the G5 games and pretty much every FCS and lower games are only viewable through ESPN+ or illegal streams of said ESPN+ feeds. Unless Youtube TV has some sort of program that I'm unaware of.

Edited by Floppin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...