Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why aren't we acquiring compensatory picks?


DMathematics
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Blah blah blah. Comp picks are overrated in the grand scheme of things. I mean, they're nice to have, but so are FAs with potential or ones that fill a need. No need to get hung up on them. The lack of comp picks will not keep a good team or franchise down.

I don't think comp picks are overrated because now you can trade them so they are basically free picks you can flip now they are very valuable we just have to figure out how to cash in correctly we never have 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Blah blah blah. Comp picks are overrated in the grand scheme of things. I mean, they're nice to have, but so are FAs with potential or ones that fill a need. No need to get hung up on them. The lack of comp picks will not keep a good team or franchise down.

They actually are now. With minority promotions taking the 3rds, there are very few going to teams for players. Only two teams got a 3rd this year. It’s projected for only 3 in 2023(and only one 4th). If it isn’t a 3rd, it doesn’t really matter. 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMathematics said:

I don't think comp picks are overrated because now you can trade them so they are basically free picks you can flip now they are very valuable we just have to figure out how to cash in correctly we never have 

So you would rather have a pick at the end of 4th-5th round than Corbett. I’ve been as critical as anyone about how they wasted them in the past. But the only valuable ones are hard to come by now. Reddick would have gotten a 4th IF the Panthers signed no one. But there is no reason to hesitate signing proven help for picks in the back end of the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So you would rather have a pick at the end of 4th-5th round than Corbett. I’ve been as critical as anyone about how they wasted them in the past. But the only valuable ones are hard to come by now. Reddick would have gotten a 4th IF the Panthers signed no one. But there is no reason to hesitate signing proven help for picks in the back end of the draft. 

But we could have signed Corbett and still got the picks we just signed to many people its a a balance that's all i'm saying you don't have to be all the way in or all the way out 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Every move we make is a knee jerk move to try to win now. There's no long term vision or plan.

Pretty much. Don't listen to someone's words, watch their actions. For any lip service about a rebuild, all the actions Rhule has taken (as final decision maker on the roster) were win now moves.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...